FIDL Open Data

Allocator ID: f03015751

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse GitHubView Registry JSON File

Remaining DataCap

15.85 PiB

Report Detail

Report 5ba5d426...5a69 from

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

f2gf...iyaq

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Yes

Average Retrievability Success Rate

9.28%

Required Copies

Audit Types

Public Open

Clients overview

Clients marked with are using Client contract.

Status:

1 issue

ID	Name	Total Allocations	Time Since Last Allocation	Spending Speed	Date of Application	Has Enough Replicas	Latest Report
f02011705	webeye.io	50 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	475 days	107.79 GiB / day	09/03/2024 05:33	Yes	View Report
f03123037	ws and the users of our tools	2.95 PiB in 5 allocations See Breakdown	198 days	7.43 TiB / day	28/05/2024 20:56	Yes	View Report
f03139621	N/A	100 GiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	394 days	259.9 MiB / day	17/06/2024 16:39	Yes	View Report
f03144229	CommonCrawl	5 PiB in 8 allocations See Breakdown	147 days	13.47 TiB / day	26/06/2024 12:36	Yes	View Report
f03147079	K2 International Education Pla...	100 TiB in 2 allocations See Breakdown	338 days	269.47 GiB / day	18/06/2024 08:21	No	View Report
f03150656	zinc5	50 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	374 days	136.9 GiB / day	21/06/2024 05:04	Yes	View Report
f03153017	VshareCloud	50 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	372 days	137.63 GiB / day	24/06/2024 15:56	Yes	View Report
f03156196	OpendataLab	5 PiB in 6 allocations See Breakdown	100 days	14.97 TiB / day	16/07/2024 08:23	Yes	View Report
f03236492	XSG	3 PiB in 7 allocations See Breakdown	105 days	11.82 TiB / day	24/10/2024 07:25	Yes	View Report
f03258177	Universityof Utah	2.3 PiB in 5 allocations See Breakdown	22 days	14.73 TiB / day	11/06/2025 21:33	Yes	View Report
f03267602	N/A	50 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	226 days	226.55 GiB / day	06/11/2024 03:15	Yes	View Report

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this allocator.

Number of providers: 83

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	HTTP Ret. URL-Finder
f0101020	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	158.72 TiB	0.93%	0.00%	14082	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0101021	Beijing, Beijing, CN	159.98 TiB	0.94%	0.00%	14177	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0112781	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	159.5 TiB	0.94%	0.00%	14123	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01164500	Columbus, Ohio, US	159.24 TiB	0.93%	0.00%	14111	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0122215	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	1.28 TiB	0.01%	0.00%	72661	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01240	Lelystad, Flevoland, NL	5.16 TiB	0.03%	0.00%	12974	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01392893	Amsterdam, North Holland, NL	27.13 TiB	0.16%	0.00%	5069	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01615947	San Jose, California, US	8.94 TiB	0.05%	0.00%	304	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01786387	Lelystad, Flevoland, NL	6.19 TiB	0.04%	0.00%	3329	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01896422	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	590.44 TiB	3.47%	0.00%	30250	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01912298	Ashburn, Virginia, US	120.2 TiB	0.71%	0.00%	30521	62.50%	62.50%	0.00%
f01926635	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	326.22 TiB	1.92%	0.28%	188780	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01999119	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	52.81 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	44782	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02029742	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	61.31 TiB	0.36%	0.00%	130604	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02035256	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	138.44 TiB	0.81%	0.00%	8300	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f020378	Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG	85.81 TiB	0.50%	0.00%	5949	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02088691	Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN	13.89 TiB	0.08%	0.00%	5046	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02639429	Missouri City, Texas, US	5.25 TiB	0.03%	1.19%	18382	38.46%	38.46%	0.00%
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	165 TiB	0.97%	0.00%	96957	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02851143	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	18.16 TiB	0.11%	0.00%	28229	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02870401	Jakarta, Jakarta, ID	25.38 TiB	0.15%	0.00%	111462	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02894286	Seoul, Seoul, KR	24.63 TiB	0.14%	0.00%	111049	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03035686	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	10 TiB	0.06%	0.00%	115972	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03067443	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	2.21 TiB	0.01%	5.66%	3306	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03078786	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	11.06 TiB	0.06%	1.13%	67674	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03088052	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	177.94 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	312675	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099981	Beijing, Beijing, CN	367.88 TiB	2.16%	0.00%	192890	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099987	Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH	429.31 TiB	2.52%	0.00%	127139	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099987	Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH	194.13 TiB	1.14%	0.00%	127139	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03136267	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	15.16 TiB	0.09%	0.00%	47181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03143698	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	96.88 TiB	0.57%	0.00%	11879	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144077	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	20 TiB	0.12%	0.00%	38991	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157905	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	141.91 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	137388	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157910	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	165.44 TiB	0.97%	0.00%	57181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157910	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	38.13 TiB	0.22%	0.08%	57181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03162991	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	28.59 TiB	0.17%	0.00%	36202	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	11.91 TiB	0.07%	0.00%	75470	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	39.47 TiB	0.23%	0.00%	108874	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	43.28 TiB	0.25%	0.00%	78388	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03202108	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	172.5 TiB	1.01%	0.43%	98947	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%
f03202108	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	53.22 TiB	0.31%	2.47%	98947	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	42.78 TiB	0.25%	0.00%	78540	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03215853	Portland, Oregon, US	459.34 TiB	2.70%	0.82%	122465	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03215853	Portland, Oregon, US	43.41 TiB	0.25%	1.15%	122465	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03218576	Portland, Oregon, US	773 TiB	4.54%	0.94%	125395	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03218576	Portland, Oregon, US	37.72 TiB	0.22%	0.83%	125395	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03220172	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	897.09 TiB	5.27%	0.00%	118886	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03220172	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	714.53 TiB	4.20%	0.02%	118886	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03220176	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	1.04 PiB	6.23%	0.02%	63561	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03231154	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	104.03 TiB	0.61%	0.00%	70964	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233333	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	147.97 TiB	0.87%	0.00%	128800	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251993	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	274.91 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	73176	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03252730	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	215.53 TiB	1.27%	0.00%	59968	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03253497	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	65.84 TiB	0.39%	0.00%	84392	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03253580	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	92.84 TiB	0.55%	0.00%	125766	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03260592	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	973.38 TiB	5.71%	7.54%	45878	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03291373	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	63.13 TiB	0.37%	0.00%	5622	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03298672	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE	222.34 TiB	1.31%	0.00%	147750	44.70%	44.70%	0.00%
f03298673	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE	222.53 TiB	1.31%	0.08%	147769	59.09%	59.09%	0.00%
f03308920	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	222.59 TiB	1.31%	0.11%	121375	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03308922	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	98.25 TiB	0.58%	0.92%	105718	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03308933	London, England, GB	222.34 TiB	1.31%	0.00%	111379	46.34%	46.34%	0.00%
f03321072	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	15.66 TiB	0.09%	0.20%	75037	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03333933	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	37.5 TiB	0.22%	0.92%	29602	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03358608	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	399.88 TiB	2.35%	0.00%	220891	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03363420	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	792.34 TiB	4.65%	0.00%	84004	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03385456	Lake Ridge, Virginia, US	323.03 TiB	1.90%	0.00%	90554	25.27%	25.27%	0.00%
f03385462	Lake Ridge, Virginia, US	306.56 TiB	1.80%	0.00%	90689	31.37%	31.37%	0.00%
f03402285	Beijing, Beijing, CN	322.09 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	90537	29.07%	29.07%	0.00%
f03402308	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	321.75 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	90566	51.40%	51.40%	0.00%
f03402347	Singapore, Singapore, SG	322.75 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	99720	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03402379	Singapore, Singapore, SG	322.81 TiB	1.90%	0.00%	100159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03529375	Coquitlam, British Columbia, CA	5.53 TiB	0.03%	0.00%	83006	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0567188	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.13 TiB	0.09%	0.00%	516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.06 PiB	6.35%	0.01%	43500	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0811822	Columbus, Ohio, US	120.27 TiB	0.71%	0.00%	28591	17.24%	17.24%	0.00%
f0832944	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	119.29 TiB	0.70%	0.00%	28345	5.00%	5.00%	0.00%
f08403	Bourton on the Water, England, GB	251.88 TiB	1.48%	3.24%	16696	40.00%	40.00%	0.00%
f0861594	Ashburn, Virginia, US	159.52 TiB	0.94%	0.00%	14121	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0861595	Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, CN	119.63 TiB	0.70%	0.00%	28689	96.00%	96.00%	0.00%
f0866468	Ashburn, Virginia, US	120.13 TiB	0.71%	0.00%	28649	24.00%	24.00%	0.00%
f09693	N/A	381.22 TiB	2.24%	1.09%	104414	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f097777	Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA	205.34 TiB	1.21%	0.26%	10594	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Allocators

Ecosystem

FIDL Open Data

Remaining DataCap

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution