Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Ant Steve

Allocator ID: f03019858

PulseView on Filecoin PulseGitHubView Registry JSON File

Remaining DataCap

0 B
Report Detail
Report 148b5663...4974 from 2025-05-18 01:08

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

f2ea...2wxy

Number of Clients

4

Is Multisig

Yes

Average Retrievability Success Rate

24.24%

Required Copies

4+

Data Types

Public Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Public Open Commercial/Enterprise
Private Commercial/Enterprise
Private Non-Profit/Social Impact
Other (specified elsewhere)

Clients overview

Clients marked with are using Client contract.

ID
Name
Total Allocations
Time Since Last Allocation
Spending Speed
Date of Application
Latest Report
f03050489
antalpha
32 GiB in 1 allocation
See Breakdown
426 days76.92 MiB / day07/04/2024 10:02View Report
f03061942
EarthObservatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University
5.5 PiB in 4 allocations
See Breakdown
225 days25.03 TiB / day15/04/2024 14:25View Report
f03186623
ShenyangDongya Medical Research Institute Co.
1000 TiB in 2 allocations
See Breakdown
264 days3.79 TiB / day19/08/2024 06:58View Report
f03198869
TheRieseberg Lab at the University of British Columbia
1.98 PiB in 3 allocations
See Breakdown
88 days23 TiB / day13/09/2024 12:01View Report

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this allocator.

Number of providers: 32
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01053413
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
419.22 TiB
5.75%
1.39%
13417
0.00%
0.00%
f0143858
Clifton, New Jersey, US
9.09 TiB
0.12%
0.00%
8732
0.00%
0.00%
f01949267
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
66.81 TiB
0.92%
0.65%
44051
69.73%
0.00%
f02098007
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
32 GiB
0.00%
0.00%
1
0.00%
0.00%
f02182251
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
83.31 TiB
1.14%
0.75%
2666
0.00%
0.00%
f02301
Clifton, New Jersey, US
8.63 TiB
0.12%
0.00%
9404
0.00%
0.00%
f02362412
Los Angeles, California, US
90.56 TiB
1.24%
0.38%
211355
33.81%
0.00%
f02368946
Beijing, Beijing, CN
86.63 TiB
1.19%
0.00%
215267
34.78%
0.00%
f02639492
Los Angeles, California, US
120.94 TiB
1.66%
0.39%
210230
28.75%
0.00%
f02822222
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
116.31 TiB
1.60%
0.46%
230204
0.00%
0.00%
f02825282
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
398 TiB
5.46%
11.87%
113241
0.00%
0.00%
f02825444
Singapore, Singapore, SG
94.56 TiB
1.30%
0.00%
86801
0.00%
0.00%
f02825855
Paripark, Seoul, KR
91.34 TiB
1.25%
0.00%
78006
0.00%
0.00%
f02826123
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
444.34 TiB
6.10%
0.00%
97989
0.00%
0.00%
f02826234
Foshan, Guangdong, CN
351.06 TiB
4.82%
0.00%
100934
0.00%
0.00%
f02826253
Singapore, Singapore, SG
97.06 TiB
1.33%
0.03%
115620
0.00%
0.00%
f03078086
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
537.53 TiB
7.38%
0.00%
23560
0.00%
0.00%
f03126993
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
280.13 TiB
3.84%
0.00%
42018
58.70%
58.70%
f03126993
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
196 TiB
2.69%
0.00%
42018
58.70%
58.70%
f03166666
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
194.91 TiB
2.68%
13.53%
210703
0.00%
0.00%
f03166668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
266.63 TiB
3.66%
17.28%
210941
0.00%
0.00%
f03223
Clifton, New Jersey, US
8.47 TiB
0.12%
0.00%
9282
0.00%
0.00%
f03226688
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
604.69 TiB
8.30%
0.42%
67361
87.68%
0.00%
f03226688
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
199.97 TiB
2.74%
0.00%
67361
87.68%
0.00%
f03226691
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
547.56 TiB
7.52%
8.69%
22952
0.00%
0.00%
f03228500
Atlanta, Georgia, US
390.97 TiB
5.37%
0.00%
43997
59.64%
59.64%
f03228500
Atlanta, Georgia, US
198.94 TiB
2.73%
0.05%
43997
59.64%
59.64%
f03251999
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
198.56 TiB
2.73%
0.00%
43703
59.72%
59.72%
f03251999
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
198.06 TiB
2.72%
0.00%
43703
59.72%
59.72%
f03270850
San Francisco, California, US
79.34 TiB
1.09%
0.00%
10329
72.96%
72.96%
f03511111
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
509.28 TiB
6.99%
0.00%
39144
0.00%
0.00%
f03515608
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
397.19 TiB
5.45%
0.01%
31351
4.13%
0.00%