Manual Diligence Meta Allocator

Allocator ID: f03358620

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

123.81 PiB

Report Detail

Report aaafae61...a471 from

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

f410...5ftq

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

60.71%

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

5.83 days

Audit Types

Other

Clients overview

Clients marked with are using Client contract.

Status:

1 issue

ID	Name	Total Allocations	Time Since Last Allocation	Spending Speed	Date of Application	Has Enough Replicas	Latest Report
f03208378	N/A	0 B in 1 allocation See Breakdown	N/A	N/A	01/01/1970 00:00	Yes	View Report
f03337791	NASAUSGS	1.75 PiB in 2 allocations See Breakdown	43 days	18.86 TiB / day	21/01/2025 05:57	Yes	View Report
f03340154	N/A	0 B in 1 allocation See Breakdown	N/A	N/A	01/01/1970 00:00	No	View Report
f03359919	MoonlightGrowth	20 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	216 days	94.81 GiB / day	30/01/2025 05:59	No	View Report
f03416756	Universityof Utah	409.6 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	76 days	5.39 TiB / day	11/06/2025 21:33	Yes	View Report
f03501575	N/A	0 B in 1 allocation See Breakdown	N/A	N/A	01/01/1970 00:00	Yes	View Report
f03605847	Space Telescope Science Instit...	256 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	102 days	2.51 TiB / day	26/05/2025 04:36	No	View Report
f03607027	JamesWebb Space Telescope	256 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	98 days	2.61 TiB / day	01/06/2025 05:20	Yes	View Report
f03617895	NRELWind Integration National ...	1.85 PiB in 4 allocations See Breakdown	55 days	24.89 TiB / day	05/03/2025 10:33	No	View Report
f03628920	Departmentof Energy's Open Ene...	256 TiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	50 days	5.12 TiB / day	30/06/2025 11:21	No	View Report

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this allocator.

Number of providers: 36

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f0101020	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	225.91 TiB	5.14%	0.00%	15454	100.00%	100.00%	95.00%
f0101021	Beijing, Beijing, CN	232.6 TiB	5.29%	0.00%	15940	100.00%	100.00%	97.00%
f0112781	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	232.24 TiB	5.28%	0.00%	15882	71.43%	71.43%	99.00%
f01164500	Columbus, Ohio, US	232.24 TiB	5.28%	0.00%	15874	100.00%	100.00%	99.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	113.02 TiB	2.57%	0.00%	18454	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01404908	Seoul, Seoul, KR	69.41 TiB	1.58%	0.09%	2224	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01912298	Ashburn, Virginia, US	142.3 TiB	3.23%	0.00%	32508	98.33%	98.33%	99.00%
f02825675	Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN	26.59 TiB	0.60%	0.00%	80276	11.29%	11.29%	84.00%
f02826602	Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN	25 TiB	0.57%	0.00%	81125	11.06%	11.06%	85.00%
f02827109	Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN	34.5 TiB	0.78%	0.00%	80777	13.66%	13.66%	75.00%
f02827843	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	34.09 TiB	0.77%	0.00%	81053	16.67%	16.67%	0.00%
f02827953	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	28.06 TiB	0.64%	0.00%	83672	10.65%	10.65%	88.00%
f02860778	Seoul, Seoul, KR	21.4 TiB	0.49%	6.72%	1534	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02860783	Seoul, Seoul, KR	23.88 TiB	0.54%	0.00%	1797	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02869125	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	237.88 TiB	5.41%	0.00%	45566	96.69%	96.69%	100.00%
f02869125	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	44.22 TiB	1.01%	0.00%	45566	96.69%	96.69%	100.00%
f02874347	Los Angeles, California, US	288.81 TiB	6.56%	0.00%	40522	87.50%	87.50%	100.00%
f02874347	Los Angeles, California, US	15.59 TiB	0.35%	0.00%	40522	87.50%	87.50%	100.00%
f02911610	Hanoi, Hanoi, VN	230 TiB	5.23%	11.40%	9458	96.55%	96.55%	99.00%
f02916974	Los Angeles, California, US	300.59 TiB	6.83%	0.00%	48774	88.55%	88.55%	100.00%
f02916974	Los Angeles, California, US	59.13 TiB	1.34%	0.00%	48774	88.55%	88.55%	100.00%
f02930717	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	310.22 TiB	7.05%	0.00%	34058	95.03%	95.03%	59.00%
f02930717	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	42.19 TiB	0.96%	0.00%	34058	95.03%	95.03%	59.00%
f02943119	Chinch'ŏn, North Chungcheong, KR	28.58 TiB	0.65%	0.66%	1517	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	293.44 TiB	6.67%	0.00%	46091	87.18%	87.18%	100.00%
f03233356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	53.81 TiB	1.22%	0.00%	46091	87.18%	87.18%	100.00%
f03270850	San Francisco, California, US	256 MiB	0.00%	0.00%	16357	71.13%	71.13%	0.00%
f03277367	San Francisco, California, US	80 MiB	0.00%	0.00%	8	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03383926	Seoul, Seoul, KR	21.69 TiB	0.49%	0.72%	945	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03513545	Moscow, Moscow, RU	199.88 TiB	4.54%	0.00%	8543	80.43%	80.43%	100.00%
f03552222	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	31.91 TiB	0.73%	2.06%	36148	32.32%	32.32%	0.00%
f0811822	Columbus, Ohio, US	142.04 TiB	3.23%	0.00%	30556	96.90%	96.90%	100.00%
f0832944	Zhengzhou, Henan, CN	141.81 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	30358	88.44%	88.44%	100.00%
f0861594	Ashburn, Virginia, US	232.39 TiB	5.28%	0.00%	15893	85.71%	85.71%	64.00%
f0861595	Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, CN	141.8 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	30688	96.95%	96.95%	100.00%
f0866468	Ashburn, Virginia, US	142.15 TiB	3.23%	0.00%	30628	94.16%	94.16%	53.00%

Allocators

Ecosystem

Manual Diligence Meta Allocator

Remaining DataCap

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution