Open
No
N/A
123.90 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
626.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.3%
Deal Percentage
1.91% / 11.97 TiB
Duplication
155658
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
520.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.01%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 64 GiB
Duplication
224838
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
546.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.83%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
150128
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10800 ms
Time to First Byte
33.19 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
497.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.33%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
91228
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
658.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.29%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 160 GiB
Duplication
152776
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
48.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
107914
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
15819 ms
Time to First Byte
7.38 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
348.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129023
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 63.59 TiB | 254.38 TiB | 7.83% |
| 5 | 128.38 TiB | 642.13 TiB | 19.76% |
| 1 | 44.25 TiB | 44.28 TiB | 1.36% |
| 3 | 6.19 TiB | 18.56 TiB | 0.57% |
| 2 | 68.03 TiB | 136.13 TiB | 4.19% |
| 7 | 48.41 TiB | 350.19 TiB | 10.78% |
| 6 | 300.28 TiB | 1.76 PiB | 55.49% |
| 659.13 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||