f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
301.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.51%
Deal Percentage
1.39% / 4.19 TiB
Duplication
40378
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
3.59 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
301.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.51%
Deal Percentage
1.39% / 4.19 TiB
Duplication
40378
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
275.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.21%
Deal Percentage
49.89% / 137.59 TiB
Duplication
28370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Sample Piece URL not found
336.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.92%
Deal Percentage
49.79% / 167.69 TiB
Duplication
29769
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
149.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.75%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60564
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
148.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.73%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60485
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
49.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48853
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
63.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
122.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
59568
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
494.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.75%
Deal Percentage
49.74% / 245.81 TiB
Duplication
129240
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
249.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.91%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 96 GiB
Duplication
92957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
326 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.79%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
91347
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
629.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.33%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
350 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74227
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
350 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74384
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
793.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
562.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.55%
Deal Percentage
1.17% / 6.56 TiB
Duplication
69736
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
396.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126908
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
794.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106783
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dubai, Dubai, AE
Sample Piece URL not found
397.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126265
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
396.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
445.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111216
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
425.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
110747
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
531.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
128316
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 48.63 TiB | 342.34 TiB | 3.98% |
| 3 | 128.84 TiB | 386.53 TiB | 4.49% |
| 1 | 1.91 TiB | 1.91 TiB | 0.02% |
| 5 | 879.59 TiB | 4.36 PiB | 51.94% |
| 4 | 38.41 TiB | 155.63 TiB | 1.81% |
| 2 | 124.28 TiB | 248.56 TiB | 2.89% |
| 6 | 416.72 TiB | 2.92 PiB | 34.84% |
| 1.6 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||