DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 16172

Client ID: f03054979

Report Detail
Report 16172 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 10

f02023435

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

35.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.88%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

34647

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826123

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

298.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.37%

Deal Percentage

0.25% / 768 GiB

Duplication

97981

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826234

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

296.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.3%

Deal Percentage

16.03% / 47.5 TiB

Duplication

100930

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02948413

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

258.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.38%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

102192

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02956383

Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

476.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.73%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

163841

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02980903

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

399.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

210774

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03046248

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

549.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.54%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

67891

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03064819

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

539.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.3%

Deal Percentage

0.07% / 384 GiB

Duplication

60142

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066382

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

193.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.76%

Deal Percentage

0.52% / 1 TiB

Duplication

32624

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03079511

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1009.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

24.88%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 192 GiB

Duplication

177411

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
59.13 TiB
118.28 TiB
2.91%
4
109.88 TiB
439.59 TiB
10.83%
9
101.13 TiB
932.03 TiB
22.97%
1
428.16 TiB
428.16 TiB
10.55%
3
46.78 TiB
140.34 TiB
3.45%
6
24.69 TiB
148.19 TiB
3.65%
8
102.22 TiB
833.75 TiB
20.54%
5
120.03 TiB
600.22 TiB
14.79%
10
16.06 TiB
170.5 TiB
4.2%
7
34.94 TiB
246.34 TiB
6.07%
1.02 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03146638
16.41 TiB
175