Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

Beijingkebike Education Consulting

Client ID: f03061409

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

17.88 TiB

Allocated DataCap

7.04 PiB

Report Detail

Report 10264 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 32

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	79.75 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144395	55.06%	0.00%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	80.38 TiB	1.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	6332	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	155.03 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	21493	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	186.25 TiB	3.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	70600	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826007	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.06 TiB	2.64%	0.02%	Yes(11 claims)	85705	29.74%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	216.47 TiB	4.37%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	111421	7.08%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	198.06 TiB	4.00%	0.05%	Yes(18 claims)	110749	7.36%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	40.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	96331	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02830476	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	18.13 TiB	0.37%	0.00%	Not reporting	24280	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	140.41 TiB	2.83%	0.00%	Not reporting	60564	75.49%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	151.69 TiB	3.06%	0.00%	Not reporting	21285	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	137.66 TiB	2.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	60485	75.17%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.63 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	48853	75.98%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028310	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	58.34 TiB	1.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	47007	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028321	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	62.5 TiB	1.26%	0.00%	Not reporting	44466	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028325	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	53.97 TiB	1.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	43581	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	67146	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03044609	Paripark, Seoul, KR	608 GiB	0.01%	0.00%	OK	635	73.67%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	186.34 TiB	3.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	185.25 TiB	3.74%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	280.09 TiB	5.65%	0.00%	Not reporting	92944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	280.69 TiB	5.66%	0.00%	Not reporting	92957	75.28%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	91345	74.58%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	520.31 TiB	10.50%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	130156	86.65%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	1.84%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	72.32%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	250.06 TiB	5.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	111343	70.50%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228358	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	88.59 TiB	1.79%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	117545	81.06%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233966	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	25.81 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	Yes(122 claims)	79405	81.72%	0.00%	0.00%
f03241837	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	494.47 TiB	9.98%	0.00%	Yes(49 claims)	219936	80.46%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	54.16 TiB	54.16 TiB	1.09%
2	317.63 TiB	635.25 TiB	12.81%
3	69.38 TiB	208.13 TiB	4.19%
4	167.25 TiB	669.03 TiB	13.49%
5	67.38 TiB	336.94 TiB	6.79%
6	37.97 TiB	227.81 TiB	4.59%
7	14.31 TiB	100.22 TiB	2.02%
8	35.66 TiB	285.25 TiB	5.75%
9	21.03 TiB	189.28 TiB	3.81%
10	47.44 TiB	474.38 TiB	9.57%
11	131.09 TiB	1.41 PiB	29.09%
12	23.78 TiB	285.38 TiB	5.75%
13	3.75 TiB	48.75 TiB	0.98%
	990.81 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 10264 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 32

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	79.75 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144395	55.06%	0.00%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	80.38 TiB	1.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	6332	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	155.03 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	21493	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	186.25 TiB	3.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	70600	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826007	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.06 TiB	2.64%	0.02%	Yes(11 claims)	85705	29.74%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	216.47 TiB	4.37%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	111421	7.08%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	198.06 TiB	4.00%	0.05%	Yes(18 claims)	110749	7.36%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	40.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	96331	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02830476	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	18.13 TiB	0.37%	0.00%	Not reporting	24280	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	140.41 TiB	2.83%	0.00%	Not reporting	60564	75.49%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	151.69 TiB	3.06%	0.00%	Not reporting	21285	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	137.66 TiB	2.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	60485	75.17%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.63 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	48853	75.98%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028310	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	58.34 TiB	1.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	47007	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028321	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	62.5 TiB	1.26%	0.00%	Not reporting	44466	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028325	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	53.97 TiB	1.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	43581	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	67146	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03044609	Paripark, Seoul, KR	608 GiB	0.01%	0.00%	OK	635	73.67%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	186.34 TiB	3.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	187.5 TiB	3.78%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	185.25 TiB	3.74%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	280.09 TiB	5.65%	0.00%	Not reporting	92944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	280.69 TiB	5.66%	0.00%	Not reporting	92957	75.28%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	91345	74.58%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	520.31 TiB	10.50%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	130156	86.65%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	1.84%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	72.32%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	250.06 TiB	5.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	111343	70.50%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228358	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	88.59 TiB	1.79%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	117545	81.06%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233966	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	25.81 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	Yes(122 claims)	79405	81.72%	0.00%	0.00%
f03241837	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	494.47 TiB	9.98%	0.00%	Yes(49 claims)	219936	80.46%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	54.16 TiB	54.16 TiB	1.09%
2	317.63 TiB	635.25 TiB	12.81%
3	69.38 TiB	208.13 TiB	4.19%
4	167.25 TiB	669.03 TiB	13.49%
5	67.38 TiB	336.94 TiB	6.79%
6	37.97 TiB	227.81 TiB	4.59%
7	14.31 TiB	100.22 TiB	2.02%
8	35.66 TiB	285.25 TiB	5.75%
9	21.03 TiB	189.28 TiB	3.81%
10	47.44 TiB	474.38 TiB	9.57%
11	131.09 TiB	1.41 PiB	29.09%
12	23.78 TiB	285.38 TiB	5.75%
13	3.75 TiB	48.75 TiB	0.98%
	990.81 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.