Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

Beijingkebike Education Consulting

Client ID: f03061409

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

17.88 TiB

Allocated DataCap

7.04 PiB

Report Detail

Report 24897 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 34

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	16.66 TiB	0.29%	0.00%	OK	233446	36.70%	36.70%	0.00%
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	80 TiB	1.37%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144834	41.15%	0.00%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	80.38 TiB	1.38%	0.00%	Not reporting	9139	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	16.44 TiB	0.28%	0.00%	OK	309305	35.00%	35.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	155.88 TiB	2.68%	0.54%	Not reporting	21548	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	367.94 TiB	6.32%	49.38%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826007	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.31 TiB	2.25%	0.02%	Yes(11 claims)	86190	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	217.78 TiB	3.74%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	112020	28.46%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	198.91 TiB	3.41%	0.05%	Yes(29 claims)	111359	30.58%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	42.69 TiB	0.73%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	96957	80.08%	0.00%	0.00%
f02830476	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	93.69 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	47689	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	140.41 TiB	2.41%	0.00%	OK	60564	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	151.97 TiB	2.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	21327	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	137.66 TiB	2.36%	0.00%	OK	60485	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.63 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	OK	48853	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028310	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	58.34 TiB	1.00%	0.00%	Not reporting	109187	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028321	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	62.5 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	105684	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028325	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	53.97 TiB	0.93%	0.00%	Not reporting	106640	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	375 TiB	6.44%	50.00%	Not reporting	150257	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03044609	Paripark, Seoul, KR	93.31 TiB	1.60%	0.00%	OK	59568	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	187.5 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	186.34 TiB	3.20%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	187.5 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	185.25 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	557.5 TiB	9.57%	49.76%	Yes(16466 claims)	129240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	280.69 TiB	4.82%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.60%	0.00%	OK	91347	74.72%	74.72%	0.00%
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	522.66 TiB	8.97%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	131432	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	252.13 TiB	4.33%	0.00%	Not reporting	112165	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228358	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	91.72 TiB	1.57%	1.70%	Yes(33 claims)	119905	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233966	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	27.5 TiB	0.47%	3.07%	Yes(122 claims)	81197	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03241837	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	500.88 TiB	8.60%	0.64%	Yes(49 claims)	221695	85.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	79.53 TiB	79.75 TiB	1.36%
2	322.25 TiB	652.19 TiB	11.19%
3	69.41 TiB	246.59 TiB	4.23%
4	166.22 TiB	804.06 TiB	13.8%
5	67.41 TiB	337.59 TiB	5.79%
6	38.16 TiB	229.25 TiB	3.93%
7	13.63 TiB	96.59 TiB	1.65%
8	35.88 TiB	288.25 TiB	4.94%
9	16.66 TiB	149.94 TiB	2.57%
10	27.25 TiB	277.91 TiB	4.76%
11	97.19 TiB	1.24 PiB	21.75%
12	26.66 TiB	398.47 TiB	6.83%
13	42.56 TiB	679.31 TiB	11.65%
14	18.78 TiB	318.72 TiB	5.47%
	1021.56 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 24897 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 34

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	16.66 TiB	0.29%	0.00%	OK	233446	36.70%	36.70%	0.00%
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	80 TiB	1.37%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144834	41.15%	0.00%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	80.38 TiB	1.38%	0.00%	Not reporting	9139	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	16.44 TiB	0.28%	0.00%	OK	309305	35.00%	35.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	155.88 TiB	2.68%	0.54%	Not reporting	21548	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	367.94 TiB	6.32%	49.38%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826007	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.31 TiB	2.25%	0.02%	Yes(11 claims)	86190	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	217.78 TiB	3.74%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	112020	28.46%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	198.91 TiB	3.41%	0.05%	Yes(29 claims)	111359	30.58%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	42.69 TiB	0.73%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	96957	80.08%	0.00%	0.00%
f02830476	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	93.69 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	47689	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	140.41 TiB	2.41%	0.00%	OK	60564	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	151.97 TiB	2.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	21327	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	137.66 TiB	2.36%	0.00%	OK	60485	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.63 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	OK	48853	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028310	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	58.34 TiB	1.00%	0.00%	Not reporting	109187	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028321	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	62.5 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	105684	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028325	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	53.97 TiB	0.93%	0.00%	Not reporting	106640	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	375 TiB	6.44%	50.00%	Not reporting	150257	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03044609	Paripark, Seoul, KR	93.31 TiB	1.60%	0.00%	OK	59568	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	187.5 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	186.34 TiB	3.20%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	187.5 TiB	3.22%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	185.25 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	1.61%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	557.5 TiB	9.57%	49.76%	Yes(16466 claims)	129240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	280.69 TiB	4.82%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.60%	0.00%	OK	91347	74.72%	74.72%	0.00%
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	522.66 TiB	8.97%	0.00%	Yes(11 claims)	131432	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	252.13 TiB	4.33%	0.00%	Not reporting	112165	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228358	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	91.72 TiB	1.57%	1.70%	Yes(33 claims)	119905	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233966	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	27.5 TiB	0.47%	3.07%	Yes(122 claims)	81197	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03241837	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	500.88 TiB	8.60%	0.64%	Yes(49 claims)	221695	85.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	79.53 TiB	79.75 TiB	1.36%
2	322.25 TiB	652.19 TiB	11.19%
3	69.41 TiB	246.59 TiB	4.23%
4	166.22 TiB	804.06 TiB	13.8%
5	67.41 TiB	337.59 TiB	5.79%
6	38.16 TiB	229.25 TiB	3.93%
7	13.63 TiB	96.59 TiB	1.65%
8	35.88 TiB	288.25 TiB	4.94%
9	16.66 TiB	149.94 TiB	2.57%
10	27.25 TiB	277.91 TiB	4.76%
11	97.19 TiB	1.24 PiB	21.75%
12	26.66 TiB	398.47 TiB	6.83%
13	42.56 TiB	679.31 TiB	11.65%
14	18.78 TiB	318.72 TiB	5.47%
	1021.56 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.