Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Frost& Sullivan (Singapore) Pte Ltd

Client ID: f03062833

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

33.47 TiB

Allocated DataCap

10 PiB
Report Detail
Report 34150 from 2025-04-13 03:01

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 21
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f014686
Montréal, Quebec, CA
522.53 TiB
6.58%
0.00%
OK
118738
52.15%
52.15%
f014699
Dallas, Texas, US
528.41 TiB
6.65%
0.00%
OK
118591
50.87%
50.87%
f02837684
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
149.94 TiB
1.89%
0.00%
OK
60564
64.18%
64.18%
f02953066
Los Angeles, California, US
148.19 TiB
1.86%
0.00%
Yes(16560 claims)
60485
64.51%
64.51%
f02956073
Singapore, Singapore, SG
109.97 TiB
1.38%
0.00%
Yes(16604 claims)
48853
63.63%
63.63%
f03028412
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
98.84 TiB
1.24%
0.00%
OK
24390
59.85%
59.85%
f03080852
Toronto, Ontario, CA
248.53 TiB
3.13%
0.00%
Yes(16466 claims)
92944
17.17%
17.17%
f03080854
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
249.66 TiB
3.14%
0.00%
Yes(16693 claims)
92957
64.13%
64.13%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
616.53 TiB
7.76%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
61.90%
61.90%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
179.78 TiB
2.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
64.32%
64.32%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
180 TiB
2.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
63.34%
63.34%
f03159226
Dallas, Texas, US
514 TiB
6.47%
0.00%
OK
80369
35.16%
35.16%
f03188440
Coquitlam, British Columbia, CA
478.31 TiB
6.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
393.5 TiB
4.95%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
395.84 TiB
4.98%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03196399
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
396.81 TiB
4.99%
0.00%
OK
111215
0.00%
0.00%
f03196401
Osaka, Osaka, JP
390.84 TiB
4.92%
0.00%
OK
110746
0.00%
0.00%
f03275720
Dallas, Texas, US
543.13 TiB
6.83%
0.00%
OK
122646
64.10%
64.10%
f03315878
Ōi, Saitama, JP
773.34 TiB
9.73%
0.00%
OK
130691
47.95%
47.95%
f03325608
Paripark, Seoul, KR
529.59 TiB
6.66%
0.00%
OK
109027
33.98%
33.98%
f03335798
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
499.34 TiB
6.28%
0.00%
OK
80678
39.85%
39.85%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
2
64 GiB
128 GiB
0%
3
4.81 TiB
14.44 TiB
0.18%
4
249.53 TiB
998.13 TiB
12.55%
5
20.41 TiB
102.03 TiB
1.28%
6
28.22 TiB
169.31 TiB
2.13%
7
104.09 TiB
728.66 TiB
9.16%
8
74.44 TiB
595.5 TiB
7.49%
9
85.47 TiB
769.22 TiB
9.67%
10
456.97 TiB
4.46 PiB
57.5%
1 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.