f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
99.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.14%
Deal Percentage
5.84% / 5.81 TiB
Duplication
40378
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
2.91 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
99.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.14%
Deal Percentage
5.84% / 5.81 TiB
Duplication
40378
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chongqing, Chongqing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
45.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.44%
Deal Percentage
48.53% / 22.22 TiB
Duplication
15186
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
80.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0.58% / 480 GiB
Duplication
86388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
110 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.47%
Deal Percentage
0.8% / 896 GiB
Duplication
21548
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
92.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.92%
Deal Percentage
0.37% / 352 GiB
Duplication
33136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
367.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.6%
Deal Percentage
49.09% / 180.44 TiB
Duplication
91077
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
31.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60564
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Wuhan, Hubei, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
210.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.64%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
21327
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
45.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60485
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
93.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48853
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tianjin, Tianjin, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
44.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.4%
Deal Percentage
0.14% / 64 GiB
Duplication
4593
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.92%
Deal Percentage
50% / 93.75 TiB
Duplication
161045
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
93.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
181.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75297
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
366.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.57%
Deal Percentage
48.93% / 179.31 TiB
Duplication
129240
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
187.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
92.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.93%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91347
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
183.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
93.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74227
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74384
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
188.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.93%
Deal Percentage
0.3% / 576 GiB
Duplication
69736
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 88.34 TiB | 341.94 TiB | 10.79% |
| 11 | 1.41 TiB | 19.63 TiB | 0.61% |
| 7 | 9.16 TiB | 90.25 TiB | 2.84% |
| 4 | 59.59 TiB | 239.22 TiB | 7.54% |
| 9 | 123.94 TiB | 1.28 PiB | 41.38% |
| 2 | 35.84 TiB | 101.38 TiB | 3.19% |
| 10 | 16 TiB | 206.44 TiB | 6.51% |
| 6 | 352 GiB | 3.09 TiB | 0.09% |
| 5 | 90.56 TiB | 453.13 TiB | 14.29% |
| 1 | 6.91 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 0.43% |
| 8 | 36.66 TiB | 388.66 TiB | 12.26% |
| 468.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||