f01025366
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
2.24 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
62.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
18905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
158.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132061
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanchang, Jiangxi, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
210.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.88%
Deal Percentage
50% / 105.22 TiB
Duplication
262530
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
97.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.73%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
68994
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
437.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.21%
Deal Percentage
49.99% / 218.56 TiB
Duplication
159304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanchang, Jiangxi, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
106.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.97%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
112.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
57693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
731.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.43%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 352 GiB
Duplication
31125
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
218.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.1%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 128 GiB
Duplication
27729
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
770.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.53%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 224 GiB
Duplication
32699
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
95.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.67%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5038
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
449.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.55%
Deal Percentage
50% / 224.66 TiB
Duplication
138296
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
35.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
1%
Deal Percentage
9.78% / 3.5 TiB
Duplication
42534
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 22.56 TiB | 193.34 TiB | 5.4% |
| 3 | 14.41 TiB | 68.88 TiB | 1.92% |
| 8 | 7.81 TiB | 81.38 TiB | 2.27% |
| 5 | 37.19 TiB | 261.44 TiB | 7.3% |
| 10 | 57.66 TiB | 749.47 TiB | 20.93% |
| 1 | 106.44 TiB | 119.03 TiB | 3.32% |
| 9 | 32.38 TiB | 386.44 TiB | 10.79% |
| 7 | 704 GiB | 6.19 TiB | 0.17% |
| 2 | 718.16 TiB | 1.4 PiB | 40.14% |
| 4 | 46.06 TiB | 276.47 TiB | 7.72% |
| 1.02 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||