f01115949
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
491 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.12%
Deal Percentage
25.21% / 123.78 TiB
Duplication
20807
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
3.22 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
491 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.12%
Deal Percentage
25.21% / 123.78 TiB
Duplication
20807
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Solihull, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
32 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
180
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
480.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.77%
Deal Percentage
24.24% / 116.41 TiB
Duplication
20921
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10407 ms
Time to First Byte
34.4 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bucharest, București, RO
Sample Piece URL not found
128 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
50% / 64 GiB
Duplication
2290
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
453.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.9%
Deal Percentage
0.92% / 4.16 TiB
Duplication
17422
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10370 ms
Time to First Byte
113.09 Mbps
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
492.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.16%
Deal Percentage
1.31% / 6.47 TiB
Duplication
18673
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10425 ms
Time to First Byte
70.83 Mbps
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
664.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.83%
Deal Percentage
28.69% / 190.72 TiB
Duplication
26006
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10393 ms
Time to First Byte
89.83 Mbps
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
463.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.21%
Deal Percentage
0.85% / 3.94 TiB
Duplication
18011
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10397 ms
Time to First Byte
81.01 Mbps
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
64 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
1542
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
352 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
44547
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 60 TiB | 332.31 TiB | 10.9% |
| 3 | 33.19 TiB | 128 TiB | 4.2% |
| 1 | 28.44 TiB | 34.63 TiB | 1.13% |
| 6 | 241.59 TiB | 1.63 PiB | 54.86% |
| 2 | 9.66 TiB | 25.84 TiB | 0.84% |
| 4 | 175.91 TiB | 854 TiB | 28.03% |
| 548.78 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||