f01901765
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
11.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.42%
Deal Percentage
0.8% / 96 GiB
Duplication
1373
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
7.98 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
11.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.42%
Deal Percentage
0.8% / 96 GiB
Duplication
1373
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
12.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.24%
Deal Percentage
1.23% / 160 GiB
Duplication
5272
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Taizhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
9.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.55%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
2553
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kunming, Yunnan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
14.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
24.47%
Deal Percentage
9.47% / 1.39 TiB
Duplication
2702
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
11 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.32%
Deal Percentage
2.27% / 256 GiB
Duplication
2676
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.05 TiB | 17.09 TiB | 28.47% |
| 1 | 4.28 TiB | 4.28 TiB | 7.13% |
| 5 | 1.67 TiB | 8.92 TiB | 14.86% |
| 3 | 4.44 TiB | 13.64 TiB | 22.72% |
| 2 | 8 TiB | 16.09 TiB | 26.8% |
| 22.44 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||