Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CIDgravity

Client ID: f03079189

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

199.56 TiB

Allocated DataCap

350 TiB
Report Detail
Report 14011 from 2025-02-15 03:15

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 21
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010479
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
16.06 TiB
11.68%
7.98%
OK
936
92.37%
0.00%
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.84 TiB
4.98%
3.65%
Not reporting
9285
36.11%
0.00%
f01163272
Perm, Perm Krai, RU
8.66 TiB
6.30%
0.00%
Not reporting
524
0.00%
0.00%
f01222595
Moscow, Moscow, RU
5.34 TiB
3.89%
2.34%
Not reporting
13689
63.56%
0.00%
f01443744
Falkenstein, Saxony, DE
2.44 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
Not reporting
101
0.00%
0.00%
f01770778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.19 TiB
4.50%
2.02%
Not reporting
9545
17.29%
0.00%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
7.06 TiB
5.14%
1.77%
OK
9269
87.55%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
4.66 TiB
3.39%
0.00%
Not reporting
10387
4.88%
0.00%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
4.81 TiB
3.50%
5.84%
Not reporting
11599
0.56%
0.00%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.88 TiB
5.00%
3.64%
Not reporting
11345
3.40%
0.00%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.78 TiB
4.93%
5.99%
Not reporting
10998
5.02%
0.00%
f020378
Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG
5.25 TiB
3.82%
2.38%
Not reporting
3170
95.73%
0.00%
f02177086
Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, RU
11.22 TiB
8.16%
3.90%
Not reporting
487
0.00%
0.00%
f02639429
Sugar Land, Texas, US
352 GiB
0.25%
0.00%
Not reporting
4144
0.00%
0.00%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
512 GiB
0.36%
0.00%
OK
522
99.59%
0.00%
f03084393
Manchester, Connecticut, US
15.59 TiB
11.34%
8.42%
Not reporting
3967
60.02%
0.00%
f03091958
Incheon, Incheon, KR
544 GiB
0.39%
0.00%
OK
10738
0.00%
0.00%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
192 GiB
0.14%
0.00%
Not reporting
10547
0.00%
0.00%
f0717969
Los Angeles, California, US
9.84 TiB
7.16%
2.86%
Not reporting
33281
0.00%
0.00%
f08403
Capel Saint Mary, England, GB
9.5 TiB
6.91%
5.59%
OK
10497
52.72%
0.00%
f097777
Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
8.78 TiB
6.39%
0.00%
Not reporting
8371
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
576 GiB
576 GiB
0.4%
2
32 GiB
64 GiB
0.04%
4
32 GiB
256 GiB
0.18%
5
128 GiB
928 GiB
0.65%
6
1.19 TiB
9.44 TiB
6.86%
7
2.53 TiB
20.28 TiB
14.75%
8
6.41 TiB
51.47 TiB
37.44%
9
928 GiB
8.16 TiB
5.93%
10
288 GiB
2.81 TiB
2.04%
11
384 GiB
4.13 TiB
3%
12
3.28 TiB
39.41 TiB
28.66%
15.72 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f02824311
6.69 TiB
20