Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CIDgravity

Client ID: f03079189

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

199.56 TiB

Allocated DataCap

350 TiB
Report Detail
Report 33843 from 2025-04-12 03:14

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 21
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010479
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
16.66 TiB
11.56%
7.69%
OK
1186
81.05%
81.05%
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.16 TiB
4.97%
3.49%
Not reporting
13181
79.74%
79.74%
f01163272
Perm, Perm Krai, RU
8.66 TiB
6.01%
0.00%
Not reporting
1353
0.00%
0.00%
f01222595
Moscow, Moscow, RU
6.16 TiB
4.27%
2.03%
Not reporting
15562
57.59%
0.00%
f01443744
Falkenstein, Saxony, DE
2.44 TiB
1.69%
0.00%
Not reporting
101
0.00%
0.00%
f01770778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.5 TiB
4.51%
1.92%
Not reporting
13794
86.92%
86.92%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
7.81 TiB
5.42%
1.60%
OK
10302
75.59%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
4.66 TiB
3.23%
0.00%
Not reporting
14910
20.96%
20.96%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
5.06 TiB
3.51%
5.56%
Not reporting
16123
20.74%
20.74%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.13 TiB
4.95%
3.51%
Not reporting
15355
23.96%
23.96%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.25 TiB
5.03%
5.60%
Not reporting
15507
16.41%
16.41%
f020378
Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG
6 TiB
4.17%
2.08%
Not reporting
5087
53.49%
0.00%
f02177086
Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, RU
11.22 TiB
7.79%
3.90%
Not reporting
661
0.00%
0.00%
f02639429
Missouri City, Texas, US
352 GiB
0.24%
0.00%
Not reporting
8799
48.95%
48.95%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
608 GiB
0.41%
0.00%
OK
1261
50.03%
50.03%
f03084393
Shelton, Connecticut, US
16.06 TiB
11.15%
8.17%
Not reporting
4504
6.93%
6.93%
f03091958
Incheon, Incheon, KR
832 GiB
0.56%
0.00%
Not reporting
14778
31.14%
31.14%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
608 GiB
0.41%
0.00%
Not reporting
17315
2.41%
2.41%
f0717969
Huntington Park, California, US
10.66 TiB
7.40%
2.64%
Not reporting
39688
67.99%
0.00%
f08403
Althorne, England, GB
9.5 TiB
6.60%
5.59%
OK
15161
3.40%
3.40%
f097777
Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
8.78 TiB
6.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
10556
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
576 GiB
576 GiB
0.39%
2
32 GiB
64 GiB
0.04%
3
32 GiB
96 GiB
0.06%
4
64 GiB
384 GiB
0.26%
5
96 GiB
768 GiB
0.52%
6
1.25 TiB
9.81 TiB
6.81%
7
2.66 TiB
21.16 TiB
14.68%
8
7.06 TiB
56.72 TiB
39.37%
9
928 GiB
8.16 TiB
5.66%
10
288 GiB
2.81 TiB
1.95%
11
384 GiB
4.13 TiB
2.86%
12
3.28 TiB
39.41 TiB
27.35%
16.59 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f02824311
6.69 TiB
20