Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CIDgravity

Client ID: f03079189

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

199 TiB

Allocated DataCap

350 TiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 35245 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

20.73 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 25
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010479
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
17 TiB
11.61%
7.54%
OK
1671
100.00%
100.00%
5.00%
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.22 TiB
4.93%
3.46%
OK
14713
88.89%
88.89%
64.00%
f01163272
Perm, Perm Krai, RU
8.66 TiB
5.91%
0.00%
Not reporting
1354
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01222595
Moscow, Moscow, RU
6.41 TiB
4.37%
1.95%
OK
18450
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01249
Warsaw, Mazovia, PL
160 GiB
0.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
3419
50.00%
50.00%
0.00%
f01443744
Falkenstein, Saxony, DE
2.44 TiB
1.66%
0.00%
Not reporting
101
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01770778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.53 TiB
4.46%
1.91%
OK
14760
93.33%
93.33%
64.00%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
8.19 TiB
5.59%
1.53%
Not reporting
10361
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
4.66 TiB
3.18%
0.00%
OK
16823
29.41%
29.41%
22.00%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
5.09 TiB
3.48%
5.52%
OK
18011
45.83%
45.83%
20.00%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.16 TiB
4.89%
3.49%
OK
17220
23.81%
23.81%
34.00%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.34 TiB
5.01%
5.53%
OK
17413
35.71%
35.71%
18.00%
f020378
Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG
6.28 TiB
4.29%
1.99%
Not reporting
5981
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02177086
Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, RU
11.22 TiB
7.66%
3.90%
Not reporting
661
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02620
Warsaw, Mazovia, PL
160 GiB
0.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
4577
50.00%
50.00%
0.00%
f02639429
Missouri City, Texas, US
448 GiB
0.30%
0.00%
Not reporting
19097
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
608 GiB
0.41%
0.00%
OK
1276
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03084393
Shelton, Connecticut, US
16.16 TiB
11.03%
8.12%
Not reporting
4559
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03091958
Seoul, Seoul, KR
832 GiB
0.55%
0.00%
Not reporting
18308
25.00%
25.00%
0.00%
f03132919
Seoul, Seoul, KR
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
12387
61.54%
61.54%
0.00%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
768 GiB
0.51%
0.00%
Not reporting
20602
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03303347
Seoul, Seoul, KR
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
3380
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f0717969
Los Angeles, California, US
10.81 TiB
7.38%
2.60%
Not reporting
43501
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f08403
Bourton on the Water, England, GB
9.53 TiB
6.51%
5.57%
OK
16740
0.00%
0.00%
74.00%
f097777
Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
8.78 TiB
6.00%
0.00%
Not reporting
10594
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
576 GiB
576 GiB
0.38%
2
32 GiB
64 GiB
0.04%
4
32 GiB
256 GiB
0.17%
5
96 GiB
768 GiB
0.51%
6
1.16 TiB
9.25 TiB
6.31%
7
2.47 TiB
19.84 TiB
13.55%
8
7.63 TiB
61.22 TiB
41.8%
9
928 GiB
8.16 TiB
5.56%
10
288 GiB
2.81 TiB
1.92%
11
384 GiB
4.13 TiB
2.81%
12
3.28 TiB
39.41 TiB
26.9%
16.81 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f02824311
6.69 TiB
20