Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

PrelingerArchives LLC

Client ID: f03091977

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

96.32 TiB

Allocated DataCap

370 TiB
Report Detail
Report 24717 from 2025-03-18 03:42

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 24
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
10821
82.52%
0.00%
f01227505
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
53
0.00%
0.00%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
9720
77.80%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
608 GiB
0.31%
0.00%
Not reporting
11856
20.68%
0.00%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.15%
0.00%
Not reporting
13095
14.59%
0.00%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.15%
0.00%
Not reporting
12787
17.72%
0.00%
f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
146302
53.93%
0.00%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
320 GiB
0.16%
0.00%
Not reporting
12467
18.70%
0.00%
f01982557
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
603
0.00%
0.00%
f01987994
Seoul, Seoul, KR
192 GiB
0.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
639
15.85%
0.00%
f02011071
San Francisco, California, US
67.13 TiB
35.41%
2.00%
Not reporting
3271
2.20%
0.00%
f02259776
Klang, Selangor, MY
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
1077
83.26%
0.00%
f02639429
Sugar Land, Texas, US
78 TiB
41.15%
2.28%
Not reporting
5320
5.42%
0.00%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
1212
66.68%
0.00%
f02860778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
1017
0.00%
0.00%
f02860783
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
719
0.00%
0.00%
f02943119
Okcheon, North Chungcheong, KR
192 GiB
0.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
1030
0.00%
0.00%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
288 GiB
0.15%
0.00%
Not reporting
15781
59.85%
0.00%
f03277453
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
19569
8.45%
0.00%
f03383926
Seoul, Seoul, KR
160 GiB
0.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
69
0.00%
0.00%
f03468521
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
41.03 TiB
21.65%
0.00%
OK
2580
0.00%
0.00%
f03493414
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
416 GiB
0.21%
0.00%
OK
1679
0.00%
0.00%
f0717969
Los Angeles, California, US
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
35553
0.00%
0.00%
f0763337
San Diego, California, US
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
7155
4.72%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
25.06 TiB
26.09 TiB
13.76%
2
35.88 TiB
72.66 TiB
38.32%
3
29.19 TiB
88.75 TiB
46.81%
4
224 GiB
896 GiB
0.46%
5
128 GiB
640 GiB
0.32%
6
96 GiB
576 GiB
0.29%
90.56 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f01131298
96 GiB
2
f02208630
3.25 TiB
103