f01969746
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
8758
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.76 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
8758
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Wuhan, Hubei, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
11.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
10650
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
286.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.59%
Deal Percentage
1.32% / 3.78 TiB
Duplication
75657
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
59.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
16173
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
451.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
27.67%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 320 GiB
Duplication
131020
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
423.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
25.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
174925
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
92.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15675
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chongqing, Chongqing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
271.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.66%
Deal Percentage
1.41% / 3.84 TiB
Duplication
31013
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
31.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
67138
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 544 GiB | 3.72 TiB | 0.22% |
| 3 | 331.66 TiB | 1000.69 TiB | 61.36% |
| 1 | 147.09 TiB | 147.13 TiB | 9.02% |
| 5 | 26.41 TiB | 132.03 TiB | 8.09% |
| 2 | 42.19 TiB | 84.41 TiB | 5.17% |
| 4 | 62.97 TiB | 254.03 TiB | 15.57% |
| 6 | 1.47 TiB | 8.81 TiB | 0.54% |
| 612.31 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||