Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

BeijingMipai Culture Media

Client ID: f03132773

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

69.12 GiB

Allocated DataCap

8.83 PiB
Report Detail
Report 16065 from 2025-02-21 03:41

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 33
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
395.53 TiB
6.21%
0.00%
OK
38688
35.50%
0.00%
f01083949
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
397.84 TiB
6.25%
0.00%
OK
38521
1.86%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
329.31 TiB
5.17%
0.95%
OK
119789
64.51%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
279.88 TiB
4.40%
0.25%
OK
155016
77.30%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
392.91 TiB
6.17%
1.59%
OK
127880
33.80%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
391 TiB
6.14%
1.60%
OK
205715
20.96%
0.00%
f01928097
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
61.91 TiB
0.97%
2.27%
Not reporting
48386
0.00%
0.00%
f02013352
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
181.19 TiB
2.85%
5.17%
OK
10403
24.33%
0.00%
f02199999
Singapore, Singapore, SG
93.56 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
Not reporting
70600
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
293.97 TiB
4.62%
2.14%
OK
177596
83.56%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
302.16 TiB
4.75%
0.34%
OK
191236
75.64%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
330.38 TiB
5.19%
0.94%
OK
200010
8.59%
0.00%
f03074587
Seoul, Seoul, KR
93.75 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
Not reporting
75017
0.00%
0.00%
f03074589
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
93.75 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
Not reporting
75455
0.00%
0.00%
f03091738
Dallas, Texas, US
93 TiB
1.46%
0.00%
Not reporting
91345
67.68%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
175.22 TiB
2.75%
0.00%
Not reporting
56092
70.62%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
184.19 TiB
2.89%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
66.10%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
93.47 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
68.10%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
58.88 TiB
0.92%
0.00%
Not reporting
92143
12.84%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
93.75 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
70.05%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
187.5 TiB
2.95%
0.00%
OK
69499
70.27%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
76.47 TiB
1.20%
0.00%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
75.31 TiB
1.18%
0.00%
Not reporting
60162
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
131.88 TiB
2.07%
0.00%
OK
106879
2.59%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
112.47 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
77340
9.78%
0.00%
f03188440
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
90.09 TiB
1.42%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
91.97 TiB
1.44%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
93.59 TiB
1.47%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
108.53 TiB
1.71%
0.00%
OK
77444
10.05%
0.00%
f03229932
Seoul, Seoul, KR
94.94 TiB
1.49%
0.00%
OK
77615
7.24%
0.00%
f03229933
Seoul, Seoul, KR
150.84 TiB
2.37%
0.02%
OK
77771
5.31%
0.00%
f03300963
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
568.56 TiB
8.93%
3.30%
OK
120483
1.18%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
247.22 TiB
3.88%
2.10%
OK
95991
47.67%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
17.25 TiB
17.28 TiB
0.27%
2
98.75 TiB
197.59 TiB
3.1%
3
211.66 TiB
641.25 TiB
10.07%
4
214.38 TiB
859.75 TiB
13.51%
5
259.44 TiB
1.27 PiB
20.45%
6
118.78 TiB
716.34 TiB
11.25%
7
181.41 TiB
1.26 PiB
20.29%
8
55.81 TiB
465.53 TiB
7.31%
9
2.25 TiB
20.63 TiB
0.32%
10
5.38 TiB
56.06 TiB
0.88%
11
6.41 TiB
71.81 TiB
1.12%
12
17.25 TiB
207 TiB
3.25%
13
28.25 TiB
367.25 TiB
5.77%
14
10.72 TiB
150.06 TiB
2.35%
1.2 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.