Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

BeijingMipai Culture Media

Client ID: f03132773

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

69.12 GiB

Allocated DataCap

8.83 PiB

Report Detail

Report 17612 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

6 issues

Number of providers: 33

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	942.72 TiB	10.73%	1.76%	OK	251892	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083949	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	773.78 TiB	8.81%	0.29%	Not reporting	249003	2.63%	2.63%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	495 TiB	5.63%	0.63%	OK	204634	83.51%	83.51%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	405.56 TiB	4.62%	0.60%	OK	249017	79.78%	79.78%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	590.22 TiB	6.72%	1.06%	OK	222258	37.71%	37.71%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	590.94 TiB	6.73%	1.06%	OK	297962	39.68%	39.68%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	61.91 TiB	0.70%	2.27%	Not reporting	71395	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.19 TiB	2.06%	5.17%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.56 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	449.63 TiB	5.12%	2.50%	OK	265222	65.89%	65.89%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	302.16 TiB	3.44%	0.34%	OK	256422	70.60%	70.60%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	334.78 TiB	3.81%	0.92%	OK	263167	71.14%	71.14%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	OK	91347	76.84%	76.84%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	175.22 TiB	1.99%	0.00%	OK	56092	77.60%	77.60%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	184.19 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	OK	131157	74.05%	74.05%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.47 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	OK	74227	76.71%	76.71%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	58.88 TiB	0.67%	0.00%	Not reporting	93607	55.37%	55.37%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	76.78%	76.78%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	187.5 TiB	2.13%	0.00%	OK	69736	76.48%	76.48%	0.00%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	76.47 TiB	0.87%	0.00%	Yes(35700 claims)	75296	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	75.31 TiB	0.86%	0.00%	OK	75256	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.88 TiB	1.50%	0.00%	OK	108085	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	112.53 TiB	1.28%	0.00%	OK	77933	37.09%	37.09%	0.00%
f03188440	Surrey, British Columbia, CA	90.09 TiB	1.03%	0.00%	Not reporting	126908	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	91.97 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	OK	126265	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.59 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	108.56 TiB	1.24%	0.00%	OK	78067	26.08%	26.08%	0.00%
f03229932	Seoul, Seoul, KR	94.94 TiB	1.08%	0.00%	OK	78430	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03229933	Seoul, Seoul, KR	150.84 TiB	1.72%	0.02%	OK	78589	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03300963	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	968.56 TiB	11.02%	1.94%	OK	153780	1.44%	1.44%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	496.13 TiB	5.65%	3.20%	OK	187503	55.43%	55.43%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	28.84 TiB	28.88 TiB	0.32%
2	264.25 TiB	538.91 TiB	6.13%
3	214.75 TiB	651.66 TiB	7.41%
4	233.34 TiB	943 TiB	10.73%
5	489.5 TiB	2.4 PiB	27.92%
6	237.94 TiB	1.41 PiB	16.44%
7	184.53 TiB	1.28 PiB	14.96%
8	55.59 TiB	463.78 TiB	5.27%
9	288 GiB	2.53 TiB	0.02%
10	2.25 TiB	22.88 TiB	0.26%
11	5.34 TiB	61.09 TiB	0.69%
12	6.44 TiB	78.59 TiB	0.89%
13	17.28 TiB	224.66 TiB	2.55%
14	28.19 TiB	394.63 TiB	4.49%
15	10.75 TiB	161.25 TiB	1.83%
	1.74 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 17612 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

6 issues

Number of providers: 33

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	942.72 TiB	10.73%	1.76%	OK	251892	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083949	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	773.78 TiB	8.81%	0.29%	Not reporting	249003	2.63%	2.63%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	495 TiB	5.63%	0.63%	OK	204634	83.51%	83.51%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	405.56 TiB	4.62%	0.60%	OK	249017	79.78%	79.78%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	590.22 TiB	6.72%	1.06%	OK	222258	37.71%	37.71%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	590.94 TiB	6.73%	1.06%	OK	297962	39.68%	39.68%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	61.91 TiB	0.70%	2.27%	Not reporting	71395	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.19 TiB	2.06%	5.17%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.56 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	449.63 TiB	5.12%	2.50%	OK	265222	65.89%	65.89%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	302.16 TiB	3.44%	0.34%	OK	256422	70.60%	70.60%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	334.78 TiB	3.81%	0.92%	OK	263167	71.14%	71.14%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	OK	91347	76.84%	76.84%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	175.22 TiB	1.99%	0.00%	OK	56092	77.60%	77.60%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	184.19 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	OK	131157	74.05%	74.05%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.47 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	OK	74227	76.71%	76.71%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	58.88 TiB	0.67%	0.00%	Not reporting	93607	55.37%	55.37%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	76.78%	76.78%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	187.5 TiB	2.13%	0.00%	OK	69736	76.48%	76.48%	0.00%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	76.47 TiB	0.87%	0.00%	Yes(35700 claims)	75296	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	75.31 TiB	0.86%	0.00%	OK	75256	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.88 TiB	1.50%	0.00%	OK	108085	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	112.53 TiB	1.28%	0.00%	OK	77933	37.09%	37.09%	0.00%
f03188440	Surrey, British Columbia, CA	90.09 TiB	1.03%	0.00%	Not reporting	126908	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	91.97 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	OK	126265	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.59 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	108.56 TiB	1.24%	0.00%	OK	78067	26.08%	26.08%	0.00%
f03229932	Seoul, Seoul, KR	94.94 TiB	1.08%	0.00%	OK	78430	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03229933	Seoul, Seoul, KR	150.84 TiB	1.72%	0.02%	OK	78589	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03300963	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	968.56 TiB	11.02%	1.94%	OK	153780	1.44%	1.44%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	496.13 TiB	5.65%	3.20%	OK	187503	55.43%	55.43%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	28.84 TiB	28.88 TiB	0.32%
2	264.25 TiB	538.91 TiB	6.13%
3	214.75 TiB	651.66 TiB	7.41%
4	233.34 TiB	943 TiB	10.73%
5	489.5 TiB	2.4 PiB	27.92%
6	237.94 TiB	1.41 PiB	16.44%
7	184.53 TiB	1.28 PiB	14.96%
8	55.59 TiB	463.78 TiB	5.27%
9	288 GiB	2.53 TiB	0.02%
10	2.25 TiB	22.88 TiB	0.26%
11	5.34 TiB	61.09 TiB	0.69%
12	6.44 TiB	78.59 TiB	0.89%
13	17.28 TiB	224.66 TiB	2.55%
14	28.19 TiB	394.63 TiB	4.49%
15	10.75 TiB	161.25 TiB	1.83%
	1.74 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.