Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	762.44 TiB	9.21%	0.82%	OK	72808	38.88%	0.00%
f01083949	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	766.88 TiB	9.26%	0.29%	Not reporting	67140	0.00%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	385.41 TiB	4.65%	0.81%	OK	137260	66.83%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	279.88 TiB	3.38%	0.25%	OK	155016	78.49%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	589.84 TiB	7.12%	1.06%	OK	141818	35.63%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	590.94 TiB	7.14%	1.06%	OK	219283	35.83%	0.00%
f01928097	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	61.91 TiB	0.75%	2.27%	Not reporting	48386	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	181.19 TiB	2.19%	5.17%	OK	10403	24.97%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.56 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	70600	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	449.63 TiB	5.43%	2.50%	OK	209897	79.29%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	302.16 TiB	3.65%	0.34%	OK	191236	81.68%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	330.38 TiB	3.99%	0.94%	OK	200010	77.77%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	93.75 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.12%	0.00%	Not reporting	91345	71.27%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	175.22 TiB	2.12%	0.00%	Not reporting	56092	72.02%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	184.19 TiB	2.22%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	70.57%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.47 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	72.89%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	58.88 TiB	0.71%	0.00%	Not reporting	92143	13.73%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	72.69%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	187.5 TiB	2.26%	0.00%	OK	69499	71.79%	0.00%
f03178077	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	76.47 TiB	0.92%	0.00%	Not reporting	59998	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	75.31 TiB	0.91%	0.00%	Not reporting	60162	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.88 TiB	1.59%	0.00%	OK	106881	42.24%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	112.53 TiB	1.36%	0.00%	OK	77345	59.93%	0.00%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	90.09 TiB	1.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	91.97 TiB	1.11%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.59 TiB	1.13%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	108.56 TiB	1.31%	0.00%	OK	77446	52.98%	0.00%
f03229932	Seoul, Seoul, KR	94.94 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	OK	77617	20.56%	0.00%
f03229933	Seoul, Seoul, KR	150.84 TiB	1.82%	0.02%	OK	77774	24.31%	0.00%
f03300963	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	968.56 TiB	11.70%	1.94%	OK	153780	0.04%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	418.03 TiB	5.05%	1.99%	OK	130908	66.23%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	200.06 TiB	200.09 TiB	2.41%
2	98.59 TiB	197.28 TiB	2.38%
3	210.16 TiB	637.88 TiB	7.7%
4	344.66 TiB	1.36 PiB	16.78%
5	499.06 TiB	2.44 PiB	30.19%
6	119.28 TiB	724.31 TiB	8.74%
7	181.41 TiB	1.26 PiB	15.59%
8	55.81 TiB	465.53 TiB	5.62%
9	2.25 TiB	20.63 TiB	0.24%
10	5.34 TiB	55.75 TiB	0.67%
11	6.44 TiB	72.16 TiB	0.87%
12	17.25 TiB	207 TiB	2.49%
13	28.22 TiB	366.84 TiB	4.43%
14	10.75 TiB	150.5 TiB	1.81%
	1.74 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.