Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	942.72 TiB	10.74%	1.76%	OK	133639	0.29%	0.00%
f01083949	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	766.88 TiB	8.74%	0.29%	Not reporting	119304	20.45%	20.45%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	494.97 TiB	5.64%	0.63%	OK	154588	64.28%	64.28%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	405.47 TiB	4.62%	0.60%	OK	197206	59.26%	59.26%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	589.84 TiB	6.72%	1.06%	OK	181637	25.20%	25.20%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	590.94 TiB	6.74%	1.06%	OK	257201	29.85%	29.85%
f01928097	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	61.91 TiB	0.71%	2.27%	Not reporting	49457	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	181.19 TiB	2.07%	5.17%	OK	31829	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.56 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	70600	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	449.63 TiB	5.12%	2.50%	OK	209897	58.75%	58.75%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	302.16 TiB	3.44%	0.34%	OK	205418	61.60%	61.60%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	330.38 TiB	3.77%	0.94%	OK	200010	62.11%	62.11%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	1.06%	0.00%	OK	91345	51.26%	51.26%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	175.22 TiB	2.00%	0.00%	Not reporting	56092	51.27%	51.27%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	184.19 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	50.22%	50.22%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.47 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	51.45%	51.45%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	58.88 TiB	0.67%	0.00%	Not reporting	92143	5.11%	5.11%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	51.40%	51.40%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	187.5 TiB	2.14%	0.00%	OK	69499	53.08%	53.08%
f03178077	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	76.47 TiB	0.87%	0.00%	Not reporting	59998	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	75.31 TiB	0.86%	0.00%	Not reporting	60163	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.88 TiB	1.50%	0.00%	OK	106881	28.69%	28.69%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	112.53 TiB	1.28%	0.00%	OK	77345	41.17%	41.17%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	90.09 TiB	1.03%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	91.97 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.59 TiB	1.07%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	108.56 TiB	1.24%	0.00%	OK	77446	37.87%	37.87%
f03229932	Seoul, Seoul, KR	94.94 TiB	1.08%	0.00%	OK	77619	14.74%	14.74%
f03229933	Seoul, Seoul, KR	150.84 TiB	1.72%	0.02%	OK	77776	14.83%	14.83%
f03300963	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	968.56 TiB	11.04%	1.94%	OK	153780	0.62%	0.62%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	496.13 TiB	5.65%	3.20%	OK	156535	38.27%	38.27%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	30.19 TiB	30.22 TiB	0.34%
2	268.47 TiB	547.34 TiB	6.23%
3	209.25 TiB	635.16 TiB	7.23%
4	233.63 TiB	944.13 TiB	10.76%
5	490.44 TiB	2.4 PiB	28.01%
6	239.84 TiB	1.42 PiB	16.6%
7	181.38 TiB	1.26 PiB	14.73%
8	55.56 TiB	463.53 TiB	5.28%
9	288 GiB	2.53 TiB	0.02%
10	2.25 TiB	22.88 TiB	0.26%
11	5.34 TiB	61.09 TiB	0.69%
12	6.44 TiB	78.59 TiB	0.89%
13	17.28 TiB	224.66 TiB	2.56%
14	28.19 TiB	394.63 TiB	4.49%
15	10.75 TiB	161.25 TiB	1.83%
	1.74 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.