f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.69%
Deal Percentage
49.4% / 205.97 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.14 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.69%
Deal Percentage
49.4% / 205.97 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
378 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.13%
Deal Percentage
49.74% / 188 TiB
Duplication
65105
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
370.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.82%
Deal Percentage
50.08% / 185.38 TiB
Duplication
195957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
160.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.44%
Deal Percentage
6.22% / 10 TiB
Duplication
100934
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
435.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.44%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 320 GiB
Duplication
109452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
235.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.42%
Deal Percentage
0.11% / 256 GiB
Duplication
112266
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
14.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
21649
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
189.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.6%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
182184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
297.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
177419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73.63 TiB | 73.63 TiB | 2.94% |
| 6 | 35.91 TiB | 315.5 TiB | 12.62% |
| 4 | 15.53 TiB | 78.06 TiB | 3.12% |
| 3 | 25.81 TiB | 78.03 TiB | 3.12% |
| 2 | 184.53 TiB | 369.06 TiB | 14.77% |
| 7 | 134.69 TiB | 1.32 PiB | 54.09% |
| 5 | 10.84 TiB | 76.13 TiB | 3.04% |
| 8 | 14.22 TiB | 156.5 TiB | 6.26% |
| 495.16 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||