Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

USANASA

Client ID: f03139573

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

139.16 TiB

Allocated DataCap

8.25 PiB
Report Detail
Report 17502 from 2025-02-25 04:09

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
176.13 TiB
3.24%
0.00%
OK
43747
40.22%
0.00%
f01083949
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
179.56 TiB
3.30%
0.00%
OK
44655
1.45%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
500.34 TiB
9.19%
2.50%
OK
119789
61.32%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
503.53 TiB
9.25%
2.74%
OK
155016
71.67%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
362.38 TiB
6.66%
0.76%
OK
130783
32.62%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
387.47 TiB
7.12%
1.58%
OK
208261
23.94%
0.00%
f02199999
Singapore, Singapore, SG
94.5 TiB
1.74%
0.86%
Not reporting
70600
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
354.94 TiB
6.52%
5.27%
OK
193930
75.99%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
394.94 TiB
7.26%
2.17%
OK
191236
70.88%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
376.91 TiB
6.93%
2.36%
OK
200010
52.84%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.5 TiB
3.45%
0.00%
Not reporting
56092
65.25%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
180.25 TiB
3.31%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
63.12%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
97.67 TiB
1.79%
0.00%
Not reporting
92143
12.28%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
61.31 TiB
1.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
80983
20.61%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
97.92 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
97.52 TiB
1.79%
0.00%
Not reporting
60162
0.00%
0.00%
f03179555
Singapore, Singapore, SG
95.73 TiB
1.76%
0.00%
OK
45562
15.24%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
97.73 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
OK
106880
2.48%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
97.95 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
OK
77345
10.58%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
96.98 TiB
1.78%
0.00%
OK
77445
9.27%
0.00%
f03229932
Seoul, Seoul, KR
98.2 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
OK
77617
7.40%
0.00%
f03300963
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
615.47 TiB
11.31%
3.74%
OK
131205
1.63%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
287.47 TiB
5.28%
2.17%
OK
95991
61.36%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
160 GiB
160 GiB
0%
2
26.56 TiB
56.66 TiB
1.04%
3
71.03 TiB
224.88 TiB
4.13%
4
44.78 TiB
182.09 TiB
3.34%
5
196.56 TiB
1000.19 TiB
18.37%
6
190.69 TiB
1.15 PiB
21.68%
7
200.69 TiB
1.39 PiB
26.13%
8
70.27 TiB
570.75 TiB
10.48%
9
33.91 TiB
308.53 TiB
5.66%
10
49.66 TiB
496.56 TiB
9.12%
884.3 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.