Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

Xuet

Client ID: f03139932

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

243.72 TiB

Allocated DataCap

6 PiB

Report Detail

Report 31539 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

5 issues

Number of providers: 35

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	93.75 TiB	0.79%	0.00%	Not reporting	40378	74.19%	74.19%	0.00%
f01081394	N/A	411.97 TiB	3.46%	2.97%	Not reporting	90790	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01081419	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	199.75 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	140310	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083919	London, England, GB	24.31 TiB	0.20%	0.00%	OK	58420	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083931	Changsha, Hunan, CN	307.5 TiB	2.58%	1.26%	OK	181442	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	860.13 TiB	7.22%	1.24%	OK	255110	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083949	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	840.31 TiB	7.05%	2.21%	Not reporting	250276	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084149	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	199.75 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	137880	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	856 TiB	7.18%	1.43%	OK	225666	74.19%	74.19%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	611.78 TiB	5.13%	1.97%	OK	274725	76.92%	76.92%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	488.94 TiB	4.10%	0.02%	OK	242617	33.86%	33.86%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	486.13 TiB	4.08%	0.19%	OK	318641	35.53%	35.53%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.59 TiB	1.52%	2.79%	Not reporting	71483	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	51.81 TiB	0.43%	0.00%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	750.69 TiB	6.30%	1.26%	OK	290833	65.95%	65.95%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	719.94 TiB	6.04%	0.42%	OK	283400	73.97%	73.97%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	704.88 TiB	5.91%	0.88%	OK	289582	76.49%	76.49%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	187.47 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	56092	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.59 TiB	1.54%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	184.66 TiB	1.55%	0.00%	OK	74227	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	267.5 TiB	2.24%	2.08%	Not reporting	93759	50.00%	50.00%	0.00%
f03151456	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	261.75 TiB	2.20%	2.24%	Yes(16653 claims)	82083	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	185.09 TiB	1.55%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	31.25 TiB	0.26%	0.00%	OK	69736	75.64%	75.64%	0.00%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.56 TiB	2.03%	2.59%	Yes(35700 claims)	75470	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.91 TiB	2.03%	2.48%	OK	75493	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	158.66 TiB	1.33%	3.51%	OK	108874	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	189.59 TiB	1.59%	3.30%	OK	78388	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	62.19 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	Not reporting	126908	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	61.81 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	OK	126265	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	61.44 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	192.75 TiB	1.62%	3.23%	OK	78540	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03277453	Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY	200 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	74240	92.31%	92.31%	0.00%
f03300963	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	571.88 TiB	4.80%	2.19%	OK	153780	0.77%	0.77%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	846.09 TiB	7.10%	0.74%	OK	213424	55.87%	55.87%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	52.28 TiB	54.34 TiB	0.45%
2	50.56 TiB	105.44 TiB	0.88%
3	219.09 TiB	663.78 TiB	5.57%
4	204.91 TiB	831.41 TiB	6.97%
5	192.75 TiB	976.5 TiB	8.19%
6	288.06 TiB	1.72 PiB	14.78%
7	284.69 TiB	1.97 PiB	16.9%
8	341.47 TiB	2.68 PiB	23.03%
9	151.94 TiB	1.34 PiB	11.52%
10	71.13 TiB	725.5 TiB	6.08%
11	57.81 TiB	664.66 TiB	5.57%
	1.87 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 31539 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

5 issues

Number of providers: 35

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	93.75 TiB	0.79%	0.00%	Not reporting	40378	74.19%	74.19%	0.00%
f01081394	N/A	411.97 TiB	3.46%	2.97%	Not reporting	90790	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01081419	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	199.75 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	140310	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083919	London, England, GB	24.31 TiB	0.20%	0.00%	OK	58420	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083931	Changsha, Hunan, CN	307.5 TiB	2.58%	1.26%	OK	181442	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	860.13 TiB	7.22%	1.24%	OK	255110	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01083949	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	840.31 TiB	7.05%	2.21%	Not reporting	250276	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084149	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	199.75 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	137880	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	856 TiB	7.18%	1.43%	OK	225666	74.19%	74.19%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	611.78 TiB	5.13%	1.97%	OK	274725	76.92%	76.92%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	488.94 TiB	4.10%	0.02%	OK	242617	33.86%	33.86%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	486.13 TiB	4.08%	0.19%	OK	318641	35.53%	35.53%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.59 TiB	1.52%	2.79%	Not reporting	71483	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	51.81 TiB	0.43%	0.00%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	750.69 TiB	6.30%	1.26%	OK	290833	65.95%	65.95%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	719.94 TiB	6.04%	0.42%	OK	283400	73.97%	73.97%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	704.88 TiB	5.91%	0.88%	OK	289582	76.49%	76.49%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	187.47 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	56092	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.59 TiB	1.54%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	184.66 TiB	1.55%	0.00%	OK	74227	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	267.5 TiB	2.24%	2.08%	Not reporting	93759	50.00%	50.00%	0.00%
f03151456	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	261.75 TiB	2.20%	2.24%	Yes(16653 claims)	82083	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	185.09 TiB	1.55%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	31.25 TiB	0.26%	0.00%	OK	69736	75.64%	75.64%	0.00%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.56 TiB	2.03%	2.59%	Yes(35700 claims)	75470	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.91 TiB	2.03%	2.48%	OK	75493	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	158.66 TiB	1.33%	3.51%	OK	108874	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	189.59 TiB	1.59%	3.30%	OK	78388	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	62.19 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	Not reporting	126908	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	61.81 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	OK	126265	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	61.44 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	192.75 TiB	1.62%	3.23%	OK	78540	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03277453	Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY	200 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	OK	74240	92.31%	92.31%	0.00%
f03300963	Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN	571.88 TiB	4.80%	2.19%	OK	153780	0.77%	0.77%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	846.09 TiB	7.10%	0.74%	OK	213424	55.87%	55.87%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	52.28 TiB	54.34 TiB	0.45%
2	50.56 TiB	105.44 TiB	0.88%
3	219.09 TiB	663.78 TiB	5.57%
4	204.91 TiB	831.41 TiB	6.97%
5	192.75 TiB	976.5 TiB	8.19%
6	288.06 TiB	1.72 PiB	14.78%
7	284.69 TiB	1.97 PiB	16.9%
8	341.47 TiB	2.68 PiB	23.03%
9	151.94 TiB	1.34 PiB	11.52%
10	71.13 TiB	725.5 TiB	6.08%
11	57.81 TiB	664.66 TiB	5.57%
	1.87 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.