DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 184261

Client ID: f03143085

Report Detail
Report 184261 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.38 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 26

f010202

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

65.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.22%

Deal Percentage

4.85% / 3.19 TiB

Duplication

40378

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083939

Montréal, Quebec, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

150.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.79%

Deal Percentage

3.11% / 4.69 TiB

Duplication

262897

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

116.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.16%

Deal Percentage

4.66% / 5.44 TiB

Duplication

263025

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

420.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.78%

Deal Percentage

17.81% / 74.84 TiB

Duplication

338184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

657.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.17%

Deal Percentage

27.28% / 179.38 TiB

Duplication

433076

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01518369

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

310.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.75%

Deal Percentage

2.33% / 7.25 TiB

Duplication

358106

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10160 ms

Time to First Byte

266.67 Mbps

Bandwidth

f01889668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

313.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.81%

Deal Percentage

2.92% / 9.16 TiB

Duplication

531351

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10159 ms

Time to First Byte

7.02 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03055005

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

272.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.04%

Deal Percentage

2.58% / 7.03 TiB

Duplication

373449

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055018

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

496.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.19%

Deal Percentage

3.7% / 18.34 TiB

Duplication

421661

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055029

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

486.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.02%

Deal Percentage

1.83% / 8.91 TiB

Duplication

434233

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03091739

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

93.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0.1% / 96 GiB

Duplication

56092

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03144037

Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

176.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131157

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03148356

Ōi, Saitama, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

93.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.73%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

74227

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03151449

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

98.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.82%

Deal Percentage

0.38% / 384 GiB

Duplication

93760

Total Claims

63%

RPA

63%

Consistent RPA

37%

Inconsistent RPA

11027 ms

Time to First Byte

11.05 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03151456

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

98.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.83%

Deal Percentage

0.22% / 224 GiB

Duplication

82085

Total Claims

64%

RPA

64%

Consistent RPA

36%

Inconsistent RPA

10840 ms

Time to First Byte

17.47 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03156617

Sydney, New South Wales, AU

Sample Piece URL not found

93.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

74384

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03173127

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0.27% / 256 GiB

Duplication

69736

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03178077

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

100.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.86%

Deal Percentage

0.28% / 288 GiB

Duplication

75498

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03178144

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

100 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.85%

Deal Percentage

0.25% / 256 GiB

Duplication

75505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179555

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

49.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.92%

Deal Percentage

0.57% / 288 GiB

Duplication

46139

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179570

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

100.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.86%

Deal Percentage

0.53% / 544 GiB

Duplication

108883

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179572

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

100.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.86%

Deal Percentage

0.37% / 384 GiB

Duplication

78390

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214937

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

100.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.85%

Deal Percentage

0.31% / 320 GiB

Duplication

78543

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03229933

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

101.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.88%

Deal Percentage

1.51% / 1.53 TiB

Duplication

79335

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03300963

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

428.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.93%

Deal Percentage

3.65% / 15.63 TiB

Duplication

153780

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

281.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.2%

Deal Percentage

5.56% / 15.63 TiB

Duplication

321440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
171.19 TiB
1.19 PiB
22.56%
3
107.38 TiB
332.22 TiB
6.15%
4
32.09 TiB
128.72 TiB
2.38%
7
188.16 TiB
1.4 PiB
26.46%
9
46.19 TiB
418.06 TiB
7.74%
8
52.69 TiB
423.28 TiB
7.83%
2
232.06 TiB
479.59 TiB
8.87%
1
49.19 TiB
55.44 TiB
1.02%
5
180.41 TiB
915.38 TiB
16.94%
1.03 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.