f01081394
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
399.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
5.24 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
399.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65545
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
546.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.24%
Deal Percentage
0.29% / 1.56 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
532.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.1%
Deal Percentage
3.52% / 18.75 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
880.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.44%
Deal Percentage
7.23% / 63.63 TiB
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
964.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.25%
Deal Percentage
6.35% / 61.19 TiB
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
700 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.71%
Deal Percentage
30.37% / 212.56 TiB
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10160 ms
Time to First Byte
266.67 Mbps
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
700.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.72%
Deal Percentage
30.4% / 212.94 TiB
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10159 ms
Time to First Byte
7.02 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.06 PiB
Total Deal Size
10.38%
Deal Percentage
4.1% / 44.41 TiB
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.04 PiB
Total Deal Size
10.19%
Deal Percentage
2.08% / 22.16 TiB
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1016.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
1.4% / 14.22 TiB
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
61.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
62.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74227
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
62.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74384
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
46.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.45%
Deal Percentage
0.6% / 288 GiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
76.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.73%
Deal Percentage
1.47% / 1.13 TiB
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.89%
Deal Percentage
1.58% / 1.47 TiB
Duplication
78390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
92.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126908
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dubai, Dubai, AE
Sample Piece URL not found
93.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126265
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
92.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
94.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.91%
Deal Percentage
1.25% / 1.19 TiB
Duplication
78543
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
95.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.92%
Deal Percentage
2.09% / 2 TiB
Duplication
79161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
95.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.92%
Deal Percentage
2.06% / 1.97 TiB
Duplication
79335
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
406.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.9%
Deal Percentage
3.08% / 12.5 TiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
969.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.29%
Deal Percentage
1.24% / 12 TiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 118.72 TiB | 964.25 TiB | 9.24% |
| 1 | 25 TiB | 25 TiB | 0.23% |
| 10 | 198.56 TiB | 1.94 PiB | 19.04% |
| 6 | 436.63 TiB | 2.62 PiB | 25.74% |
| 7 | 212.03 TiB | 1.56 PiB | 15.28% |
| 4 | 4.28 TiB | 31.59 TiB | 0.3% |
| 3 | 64 GiB | 576 GiB | 0% |
| 5 | 280.66 TiB | 1.8 PiB | 17.65% |
| 9 | 139.69 TiB | 1.27 PiB | 12.46% |
| 1.38 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||