Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 34422 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.89 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f0122215
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
1.28 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
72661
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
61.31 TiB
1.21%
0.00%
Yes(395 claims)
130604
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03035686
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10 TiB
0.20%
0.00%
Not reporting
115972
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
177.94 TiB
3.52%
0.00%
Yes(55 claims)
312675
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
367.88 TiB
7.28%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
192890
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
429.31 TiB
8.49%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
127139
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03136267
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
15.16 TiB
0.30%
0.00%
Not reporting
47181
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03144077
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
20 TiB
0.40%
0.00%
Not reporting
38991
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03157905
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
141.91 TiB
2.81%
0.00%
OK
137388
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03157910
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
38.13 TiB
0.75%
0.08%
OK
57181
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03162991
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
28.59 TiB
0.57%
0.00%
OK
36202
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03202108
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
53.22 TiB
1.05%
2.47%
OK
98947
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
f03215853
Portland, Oregon, US
43.41 TiB
0.86%
1.15%
Not reporting
122465
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03218576
Portland, Oregon, US
37.72 TiB
0.75%
0.83%
Not reporting
125395
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03220172
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
897.09 TiB
17.74%
0.00%
Not reporting
118886
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03231154
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
104.03 TiB
2.06%
0.00%
OK
70964
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03233333
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
147.97 TiB
2.93%
0.00%
Yes(495 claims)
128800
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03252730
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
215.53 TiB
4.26%
0.00%
OK
59968
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03260592
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
973.38 TiB
19.25%
7.54%
OK
45878
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03291373
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
63.13 TiB
1.25%
0.00%
Not reporting
5622
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03333933
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
37.5 TiB
0.74%
0.92%
OK
29602
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03358608
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
399.88 TiB
7.91%
0.00%
Yes(242 claims)
220891
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03363420
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
792.34 TiB
15.67%
0.00%
OK
84004
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
593.63 TiB
593.63 TiB
11.73%
2
492.94 TiB
985.97 TiB
19.49%
3
76.31 TiB
229.38 TiB
4.53%
4
178.19 TiB
718.41 TiB
14.2%
5
166.97 TiB
902.44 TiB
17.84%
6
47.53 TiB
285.53 TiB
5.64%
7
98.38 TiB
689.31 TiB
13.63%
8
80.06 TiB
641.53 TiB
12.68%
9
1.16 TiB
10.5 TiB
0.2%
1.69 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.