f02362412
Los Angeles, California, US
465.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.52%
Deal Percentage
0.27% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
217141
Total Claims
99%
RPA
99%
Consistent RPA
1%
Inconsistent RPA
10425 ms
Time to First Byte
36.87 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.34 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Los Angeles, California, US
465.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.52%
Deal Percentage
0.27% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
217141
Total Claims
99%
RPA
99%
Consistent RPA
1%
Inconsistent RPA
10425 ms
Time to First Byte
36.87 Mbps
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
619.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.69%
Deal Percentage
0.27% / 1.69 TiB
Duplication
221291
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.52 PiB
Total Deal Size
11.77%
Deal Percentage
42.71% / 664.31 TiB
Duplication
174401
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
466 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.53%
Deal Percentage
0.47% / 2.19 TiB
Duplication
215243
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.66 PiB
Total Deal Size
12.84%
Deal Percentage
47.29% / 802.19 TiB
Duplication
171638
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
68.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.51%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126708
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
64.1 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
70.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.53%
Deal Percentage
0.18% / 128 GiB
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
98%
RPA
98%
Consistent RPA
2%
Inconsistent RPA
10437 ms
Time to First Byte
79.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.65 PiB
Total Deal Size
12.8%
Deal Percentage
47.58% / 804.78 TiB
Duplication
174364
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
605.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.58%
Deal Percentage
0.65% / 3.91 TiB
Duplication
287659
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
1.33 PiB
Total Deal Size
10.33%
Deal Percentage
41.58% / 567.78 TiB
Duplication
161982
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
1.46 PiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
46.57% / 698.38 TiB
Duplication
162602
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
232.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
137671
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
57257
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
677.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.13%
Deal Percentage
0.45% / 3.03 TiB
Duplication
216303
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
764.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.78%
Deal Percentage
0.27% / 2.03 TiB
Duplication
217032
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
260.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.97%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
122466
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
277.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.1%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
125395
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
102.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
128220
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10438 ms
Time to First Byte
5.95 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
140.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129072
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
375.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
71152
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
151.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
76448
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
124.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82177
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 370.09 TiB | 4.85 PiB | 37.56% |
| 5 | 74.63 TiB | 374.59 TiB | 2.83% |
| 2 | 17.84 TiB | 35.69 TiB | 0.27% |
| 3 | 48.59 TiB | 145.78 TiB | 1.1% |
| 4 | 141.72 TiB | 566.88 TiB | 4.28% |
| 8 | 184.28 TiB | 2.37 PiB | 18.35% |
| 9 | 263.34 TiB | 3.19 PiB | 24.72% |
| 1 | 202.59 TiB | 209 TiB | 1.58% |
| 6 | 32.63 TiB | 292.13 TiB | 2.21% |
| 7 | 85.31 TiB | 933 TiB | 7.06% |
| 1.39 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||