f01111110
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
212.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.2%
Deal Percentage
5.72% / 12.13 TiB
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
3%
RPA
3%
Consistent RPA
97%
Inconsistent RPA
10464 ms
Time to First Byte
9.28 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.25 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
212.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.2%
Deal Percentage
5.72% / 12.13 TiB
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
3%
RPA
3%
Consistent RPA
97%
Inconsistent RPA
10464 ms
Time to First Byte
9.28 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
394.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.68%
Deal Percentage
0.43% / 1.69 TiB
Duplication
106601
Total Claims
2%
RPA
2%
Consistent RPA
98%
Inconsistent RPA
10347 ms
Time to First Byte
6.06 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
209.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.13%
Deal Percentage
4.45% / 9.31 TiB
Duplication
99886
Total Claims
1%
RPA
1%
Consistent RPA
99%
Inconsistent RPA
10481 ms
Time to First Byte
15.46 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
498.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.21%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 128 GiB
Duplication
49338
Total Claims
4%
RPA
4%
Consistent RPA
96%
Inconsistent RPA
10471 ms
Time to First Byte
77.27 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
498.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.21%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 256 GiB
Duplication
62455
Total Claims
12%
RPA
12%
Consistent RPA
88%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
78.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
498.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.21%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 320 GiB
Duplication
60643
Total Claims
9%
RPA
9%
Consistent RPA
91%
Inconsistent RPA
10474 ms
Time to First Byte
78.52 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
977.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
23.97%
Deal Percentage
49.08% / 480 TiB
Duplication
76661
Total Claims
4%
RPA
4%
Consistent RPA
96%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
81.28 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
395.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
0.6% / 2.38 TiB
Duplication
100108
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10373 ms
Time to First Byte
4.23 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
395.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
0.57% / 2.25 TiB
Duplication
101790
Total Claims
4%
RPA
4%
Consistent RPA
96%
Inconsistent RPA
10373 ms
Time to First Byte
2.85 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 204.69 TiB | 1006.44 TiB | 24.67% |
| 7 | 293 TiB | 2.29 PiB | 57.46% |
| 2 | 200 TiB | 421.44 TiB | 10.33% |
| 3 | 100.31 TiB | 307.25 TiB | 7.53% |
| 798 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03053817 | 90 TiB | 288 |