f01082888
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
317.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.28%
Deal Percentage
49.68% / 157.69 TiB
Duplication
518136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
2.21 days
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
317.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.28%
Deal Percentage
49.68% / 157.69 TiB
Duplication
518136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
299.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.58%
Deal Percentage
49.86% / 149.16 TiB
Duplication
97755
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
526.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.36%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 512 GiB
Duplication
75657
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
101.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132061
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
99.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
319116
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chongqing, Chongqing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
533.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.64%
Deal Percentage
5.16% / 27.5 TiB
Duplication
31013
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
455.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15385
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
250.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
1.1% / 2.75 TiB
Duplication
9493
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84198
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 446.91 TiB | 457.47 TiB | 17.7% |
| 2 | 166.66 TiB | 427.97 TiB | 16.56% |
| 5 | 416 GiB | 2.72 TiB | 0.1% |
| 3 | 112 TiB | 344.88 TiB | 13.34% |
| 4 | 282 TiB | 1.32 PiB | 52.27% |
| 1007.97 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||