Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01025366	Qingdao, Shandong, CN	686.78 TiB	9.18%	0.18%	N/A	80.07%	0.00%
f0122215	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	1020.31 TiB	13.64%	0.25%	N/A	80.57%	0.00%
f01926635	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	902.44 TiB	12.06%	0.03%	N/A	59.26%	0.00%
f01999119	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	27.34 TiB	0.37%	0.00%	N/A	58.13%	0.00%
f03035686	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	222.97 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	N/A	32.76%	0.00%
f03068013	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	281.16 TiB	3.76%	0.00%	N/A	17.75%	0.00%
f03142258	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	382.56 TiB	5.11%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03157905	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	853.97 TiB	11.42%	0.00%	N/A	28.51%	0.00%
f03157910	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	224.81 TiB	3.01%	0.00%	N/A	44.48%	0.00%
f03162991	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	1.02 PiB	13.91%	1.59%	N/A	79.80%	0.00%
f03174685	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	846.25 TiB	11.31%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03220176	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	43.44 TiB	0.58%	0.58%	N/A	40.08%	0.00%
f03228906	Beijing, Beijing, CN	867.44 TiB	11.60%	0.12%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03231154	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	80.78 TiB	1.08%	0.00%	N/A	61.17%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	505.41 TiB	505.5 TiB	6.75%
2	38.78 TiB	77.56 TiB	1.03%
3	52.5 TiB	157.5 TiB	2.1%
4	96 TiB	385.94 TiB	5.15%
5	219.78 TiB	1.09 PiB	14.9%
6	307.03 TiB	1.8 PiB	24.64%
7	182.09 TiB	1.25 PiB	17.04%
8	264.81 TiB	2.07 PiB	28.35%
	1.63 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.