f02825282
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
60.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.07%
Deal Percentage
0.52% / 320 GiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
4.72 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
60.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.07%
Deal Percentage
0.52% / 320 GiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
144.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.98%
Deal Percentage
43.19% / 62.56 TiB
Duplication
120650
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
59.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.02%
Deal Percentage
0.42% / 256 GiB
Duplication
123876
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
120.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.11%
Deal Percentage
43.76% / 52.69 TiB
Duplication
117716
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
13.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.53%
Deal Percentage
8.35% / 1.09 TiB
Duplication
215446
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
79.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.29%
Deal Percentage
1.97% / 1.56 TiB
Duplication
93760
Total Claims
67%
RPA
67%
Consistent RPA
33%
Inconsistent RPA
11027 ms
Time to First Byte
11.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
77.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.14%
Deal Percentage
1.24% / 992 GiB
Duplication
82085
Total Claims
66%
RPA
66%
Consistent RPA
34%
Inconsistent RPA
10840 ms
Time to First Byte
17.47 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
37 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.34%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 32 GiB
Duplication
68915
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
129.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.21%
Deal Percentage
0.24% / 320 GiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
130.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.31%
Deal Percentage
1.17% / 1.53 TiB
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 31.06 TiB | 96.69 TiB | 11.33% |
| 5 | 9.22 TiB | 57.53 TiB | 6.74% |
| 1 | 4.06 TiB | 4.16 TiB | 0.48% |
| 2 | 129.25 TiB | 262.88 TiB | 30.81% |
| 6 | 25.78 TiB | 205.81 TiB | 24.12% |
| 7 | 14.66 TiB | 123.44 TiB | 14.46% |
| 4 | 18.19 TiB | 102.69 TiB | 12.03% |
| 232.22 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03137626 | 3.66 TiB | 24 |