DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 183152

Client ID: f03176766

Report Detail
Report 183152 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.48 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 25

f01969779

Boardman, Oregon, US

Sample Piece URL not found

385.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.58%

Deal Percentage

1.06% / 4.09 TiB

Duplication

95605

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02201190

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

422.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

101147

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02588263

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

187.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.23%

Deal Percentage

2.97% / 5.56 TiB

Duplication

174401

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02639655

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

257.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.06%

Deal Percentage

4.55% / 11.72 TiB

Duplication

171638

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02808877

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

649.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.73%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 128 GiB

Duplication

126708

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10429 ms

Time to First Byte

64.1 Mbps

Bandwidth

f02808899

Singapore, Singapore, SG

585.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.97%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 160 GiB

Duplication

233684

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10437 ms

Time to First Byte

79.05 Mbps

Bandwidth

f02820000

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

261.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.11%

Deal Percentage

6.39% / 16.72 TiB

Duplication

174364

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02866666

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

254.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.03%

Deal Percentage

1.89% / 4.81 TiB

Duplication

161982

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081952

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

54.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.65%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164119

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03144777

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

253.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.01%

Deal Percentage

1.68% / 4.25 TiB

Duplication

162602

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03166688

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

64 GiB

Total Deal Size

0%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113910

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03175111

Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH

734.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.74%

Deal Percentage

0.54% / 3.97 TiB

Duplication

238473

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10432 ms

Time to First Byte

6.55 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03175168

Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH

730.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.69%

Deal Percentage

0.1% / 768 GiB

Duplication

235266

Total Claims

100%

RPA

100%

Consistent RPA

0%

Inconsistent RPA

10436 ms

Time to First Byte

5.61 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03226666

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

650.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.74%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

128220

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10438 ms

Time to First Byte

5.95 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03226668

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

645.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

129072

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03253497

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

498.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.93%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 128 GiB

Duplication

84462

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03253580

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

494.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.88%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

126411

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03519199

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

105.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.25%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

101344

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03519200

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

108.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.29%

Deal Percentage

0.06% / 64 GiB

Duplication

102692

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03519208

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

121.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

105154

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10434 ms

Time to First Byte

57.66 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03559991

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

247.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.95%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 192 GiB

Duplication

200075

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10436 ms

Time to First Byte

80.2 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03559992

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

249.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

197614

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10444 ms

Time to First Byte

87.14 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03559993

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

243.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.9%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

199768

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10447 ms

Time to First Byte

57.3 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03559994

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

249.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

200298

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10436 ms

Time to First Byte

57.7 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03559995

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

13.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.16%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

180042

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10427 ms

Time to First Byte

8.2 Mbps

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
9
186.09 TiB
1.65 PiB
20.05%
11
22.38 TiB
246.16 TiB
2.92%
8
110.41 TiB
884.94 TiB
10.52%
3
9.09 TiB
27.28 TiB
0.32%
6
31.06 TiB
186.41 TiB
2.21%
12
35.72 TiB
428.97 TiB
5.1%
10
369.72 TiB
3.65 PiB
44.45%
5
57.63 TiB
288.16 TiB
3.42%
7
22.53 TiB
157.88 TiB
1.87%
4
186.63 TiB
746.66 TiB
8.88%
1
15.94 TiB
15.94 TiB
0.18%
1.02 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.