DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 173822

Client ID: f03180938

Report Detail
Report 173822 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.64 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 12

f01100139

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

400.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.73%

Deal Percentage

0.27% / 1.09 TiB

Duplication

52577

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01228000

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

32.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.34%

Deal Percentage

0.58% / 192 GiB

Duplication

35408

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01993339

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

31.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

1016

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02001818

Hoi Fu Court, Yau Tsim Mong District, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

290.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.14%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

25562

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02002218

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

290.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.13%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

25589

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02002233

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

289.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.1%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

25389

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02003000

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

289 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

25010

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02003699

Moscow, Moscow, RU

Sample Piece URL not found

40.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

163863

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10783 ms

Time to First Byte

13.45 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03137648

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

299.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.51%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

151150

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03173127

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

299 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.5%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

69736

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0522948

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

98.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.14%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

38687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0867300

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

31.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

1018

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
4 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
1.08 PiB
1.08 PiB
46.33%
2
4.06 TiB
8.13 TiB
0.33%
4
290.38 TiB
1.13 PiB
48.56%
3
38 TiB
114 TiB
4.76%
1.41 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f01990040
69.38 TiB
2220
f02059734
64.34 TiB
2059
f03146632
62.69 TiB
1994