Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	9.09 TiB	0.94%	0.00%	Not reporting	8689	0.00%	0.00%
f01949267	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	66.38 TiB	6.85%	0.00%	OK	43923	1.24%	0.00%
f02301	Clifton, New Jersey, US	8.63 TiB	0.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	9361	0.00%	0.00%
f02362412	Los Angeles, California, US	90.56 TiB	9.35%	0.38%	OK	211355	0.42%	0.00%
f02368946	Beijing, Beijing, CN	86.63 TiB	8.94%	0.00%	OK	215267	0.55%	0.00%
f02639492	Los Angeles, California, US	120.94 TiB	12.49%	0.39%	OK	210230	0.38%	0.00%
f02822222	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	116.31 TiB	12.01%	0.46%	OK	230204	0.00%	0.00%
f03166666	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	194.91 TiB	20.12%	13.53%	OK	210703	0.00%	0.00%
f03166668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	266.63 TiB	27.53%	17.28%	OK	210941	0.00%	0.00%
f03223	Clifton, New Jersey, US	8.47 TiB	0.87%	0.00%	Not reporting	9208	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	39.91 TiB	73.75 TiB	7.61%
2	53.38 TiB	138 TiB	14.24%
3	16.22 TiB	56 TiB	5.78%
4	11.69 TiB	46.75 TiB	4.82%
5	42.59 TiB	213.41 TiB	22.03%
6	47.72 TiB	286.88 TiB	29.61%
7	15.22 TiB	106.81 TiB	11.02%
8	4.59 TiB	36.81 TiB	3.8%
9	1.13 TiB	10.13 TiB	1.04%
	232.44 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.