DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 178362

Client ID: f03187822

Report Detail
Report 178362 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.32 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 13

f01111110

Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN

Sample Piece URL not found

326 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.7%

Deal Percentage

0.31% / 1 TiB

Duplication

98568

Total Claims

3%

RPA

3%

Consistent RPA

97%

Inconsistent RPA

10464 ms

Time to First Byte

9.28 Mbps

Bandwidth

f01422327

Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

501.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.31%

Deal Percentage

0.24% / 1.19 TiB

Duplication

106601

Total Claims

2%

RPA

2%

Consistent RPA

98%

Inconsistent RPA

10347 ms

Time to First Byte

6.06 Mbps

Bandwidth

f01909705

Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN

Sample Piece URL not found

326 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.7%

Deal Percentage

0.31% / 1 TiB

Duplication

99886

Total Claims

1%

RPA

1%

Consistent RPA

99%

Inconsistent RPA

10481 ms

Time to First Byte

15.46 Mbps

Bandwidth

f02252023

Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

502.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.32%

Deal Percentage

0.31% / 1.56 TiB

Duplication

100108

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10373 ms

Time to First Byte

4.23 Mbps

Bandwidth

f02252024

Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

501.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.31%

Deal Percentage

0.22% / 1.13 TiB

Duplication

101790

Total Claims

4%

RPA

4%

Consistent RPA

96%

Inconsistent RPA

10373 ms

Time to First Byte

2.85 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03142258

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

13.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.27%

Deal Percentage

0.71% / 96 GiB

Duplication

42534

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03174685

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

45.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.93%

Deal Percentage

0.14% / 64 GiB

Duplication

30004

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224283

Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

375 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

8002

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224551

Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

375 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

8006

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03230392

Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN

Sample Piece URL not found

550 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.3%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

29083

Total Claims

50%

RPA

50%

Consistent RPA

50%

Inconsistent RPA

10475 ms

Time to First Byte

13.1 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03230423

Johor Bahru, Johor, MY

Sample Piece URL not found

550 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.3%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

157853

Total Claims

45%

RPA

45%

Consistent RPA

55%

Inconsistent RPA

10484 ms

Time to First Byte

77.75 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03232064

Johor Bahru, Johor, MY

Sample Piece URL not found

400 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.22%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

30691

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03232134

Johor Bahru, Johor, MY

Sample Piece URL not found

400 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.22%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

30628

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
481 TiB
964 TiB
19.81%
4
240 TiB
960 TiB
19.72%
9
119 TiB
1.05 PiB
22%
3
290.5 TiB
875.38 TiB
17.98%
6
50 TiB
300 TiB
6.16%
1
58.5 TiB
58.66 TiB
1.2%
7
91 TiB
637 TiB
13.09%
1.3 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.