DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 182551

Client ID: f03194544

Report Detail
Report 182551 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.60 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 9

f01082888

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

140.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.96%

Deal Percentage

3.68% / 5.19 TiB

Duplication

518136

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02825282

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

135.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.64%

Deal Percentage

0.39% / 544 GiB

Duplication

114051

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826815

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

34.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

123876

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02980903

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

452.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

25.57%

Deal Percentage

0.12% / 544 GiB

Duplication

215446

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03151449

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

59.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.38%

Deal Percentage

0.68% / 416 GiB

Duplication

93760

Total Claims

67%

RPA

67%

Consistent RPA

33%

Inconsistent RPA

11027 ms

Time to First Byte

11.05 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03151456

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

267.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.11%

Deal Percentage

0.48% / 1.28 TiB

Duplication

82085

Total Claims

66%

RPA

66%

Consistent RPA

34%

Inconsistent RPA

10840 ms

Time to First Byte

17.47 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03178144

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

205.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.6%

Deal Percentage

0.65% / 1.34 TiB

Duplication

75505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179570

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

263.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.9%

Deal Percentage

0.59% / 1.56 TiB

Duplication

108883

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214937

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

210.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.86%

Deal Percentage

0.55% / 1.16 TiB

Duplication

78543

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
4
5.84 TiB
23.47 TiB
1.32%
3
1.78 TiB
5.34 TiB
0.3%
1
105.53 TiB
105.53 TiB
5.96%
2
76.97 TiB
158.59 TiB
8.95%
6
127.31 TiB
767.72 TiB
43.36%
5
121.69 TiB
611.72 TiB
34.55%
7
14 TiB
98.13 TiB
5.54%
453.13 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.