Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01302188	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	99.69 TiB	4.61%	0.00%	OK	3190	43.62%	0.00%
f01996719	Beijing, Beijing, CN	194.94 TiB	9.01%	0.02%	OK	29264	48.78%	0.00%
f02362412	Los Angeles, California, US	311.75 TiB	14.41%	0.29%	OK	211355	68.12%	0.00%
f02368946	Beijing, Beijing, CN	312.16 TiB	14.43%	0.25%	OK	215267	24.45%	0.00%
f02639492	Los Angeles, California, US	311.38 TiB	14.39%	0.47%	OK	210230	73.87%	0.00%
f02822222	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	283.78 TiB	13.12%	0.85%	OK	230204	10.04%	0.00%
f03166666	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	271.84 TiB	12.56%	0.13%	OK	210703	0.00%	0.00%
f03166668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	268.94 TiB	12.43%	0.10%	OK	210941	0.00%	0.00%
f03166677	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	96 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	OK	112117	58.86%	0.00%
f03378086	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	109.13 TiB	5.04%	0.00%	OK	33373	76.08%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	404.78 TiB	404.81 TiB	18.7%
2	96 GiB	192 GiB	0%
3	4.22 TiB	12.75 TiB	0.58%
4	20.53 TiB	83 TiB	3.83%
5	68 TiB	341.38 TiB	15.77%
6	219.66 TiB	1.29 PiB	61.08%
	717.28 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.