Open
No
N/A
0.12 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
848.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.83%
Deal Percentage
14.41% / 122.28 TiB
Duplication
217141
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10425 ms
Time to First Byte
36.87 Mbps
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
849.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.85%
Deal Percentage
14.34% / 121.84 TiB
Duplication
221291
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
846.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.81%
Deal Percentage
13.96% / 118.19 TiB
Duplication
215243
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
268.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.75%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 224 GiB
Duplication
126708
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
64.1 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
365.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.09%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 288 GiB
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10437 ms
Time to First Byte
79.05 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
658.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.19%
Deal Percentage
0.3% / 1.97 TiB
Duplication
287659
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
895.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.49%
Deal Percentage
13.08% / 117.06 TiB
Duplication
216303
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
814.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.36%
Deal Percentage
10.55% / 85.94 TiB
Duplication
217032
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
288.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.02%
Deal Percentage
0.7% / 2.03 TiB
Duplication
113862
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
349.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.88%
Deal Percentage
0.85% / 2.97 TiB
Duplication
113910
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
200.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.8%
Deal Percentage
0.25% / 512 GiB
Duplication
238473
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10432 ms
Time to First Byte
6.55 Mbps
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
234.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.27%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
235266
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10436 ms
Time to First Byte
5.61 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
274.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.83%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 192 GiB
Duplication
128220
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10438 ms
Time to First Byte
5.95 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
274.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.83%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 192 GiB
Duplication
129072
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 117.44 TiB | 1.1 PiB | 15.7% |
| 6 | 53.13 TiB | 500.5 TiB | 6.98% |
| 10 | 4.72 TiB | 47.38 TiB | 0.66% |
| 12 | 229.91 TiB | 2.7 PiB | 38.58% |
| 11 | 39.69 TiB | 438.03 TiB | 6.11% |
| 8 | 175.78 TiB | 1.38 PiB | 19.65% |
| 4 | 3.72 TiB | 18.09 TiB | 0.25% |
| 3 | 128 GiB | 544 GiB | 0% |
| 5 | 62.69 TiB | 386.09 TiB | 5.38% |
| 9 | 45.75 TiB | 412.03 TiB | 5.74% |
| 1 | 64.69 TiB | 64.75 TiB | 0.9% |
| 797.63 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||