f01996719
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
400.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
94523
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10453 ms
Time to First Byte
84.77 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.52 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
400.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
94523
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10453 ms
Time to First Byte
84.77 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
23.14 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.47%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
6626
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
753.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.19%
Deal Percentage
0.53% / 4 TiB
Duplication
111529
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
134.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31944
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10046 ms
Time to First Byte
507.61 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
576.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.62%
Deal Percentage
0.71% / 4.09 TiB
Duplication
119840
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
150.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31838
Total Claims
21%
RPA
21%
Consistent RPA
79%
Inconsistent RPA
10052 ms
Time to First Byte
529.45 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.02 PiB
Total Deal Size
21.11%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77110
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
139.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.8%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31888
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
152.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31814
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
790.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.92%
Deal Percentage
0.43% / 3.38 TiB
Duplication
111109
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
794.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
16%
Deal Percentage
0.49% / 3.88 TiB
Duplication
144016
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 227.5 TiB | 682.91 TiB | 13.75% |
| 2 | 87.84 TiB | 175.81 TiB | 3.54% |
| 5 | 417.03 TiB | 2.05 PiB | 42.24% |
| 4 | 361.81 TiB | 1.42 PiB | 29.21% |
| 1 | 557.8 TiB | 557.8 TiB | 11.23% |
| 1.61 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||