Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

NationalLibrary of Medicine

Client ID: f03240472

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

10.24 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.24 PiB
Report Detail
Report 12693 from 2025-02-11 03:14

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 16
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
163.75 TiB
3.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
259021
41.60%
0.00%
f01313
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
100.03 TiB
1.85%
0.03%
Yes(143 claims)
29582
92.30%
0.00%
f01431043
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
1 TiB
0.02%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
32502
93.94%
0.00%
f01660795
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
340.09 TiB
6.29%
0.00%
Not reporting
144395
93.86%
0.00%
f02816097
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
161.97 TiB
3.00%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
82205
93.88%
0.00%
f02851143
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
357.66 TiB
6.62%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
28169
93.30%
0.00%
f03066836
Changsha, Hunan, CN
48.66 TiB
0.90%
0.00%
Not reporting
27082
86.63%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
659.38 TiB
12.20%
0.00%
Yes(121 claims)
144392
95.57%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
1.42 PiB
26.86%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
126762
95.85%
0.00%
f03100004
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
145.13 TiB
2.69%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
130156
59.07%
0.00%
f03100009
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
200.09 TiB
3.70%
0.00%
Not reporting
300378
0.00%
0.00%
f03228358
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
172.5 TiB
3.19%
0.00%
Not reporting
117517
0.00%
0.00%
f03231666
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
243.69 TiB
4.51%
0.00%
Not reporting
129146
93.57%
0.00%
f03233966
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
77.03 TiB
1.43%
0.00%
Not reporting
79389
0.00%
0.00%
f03251993
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
788.56 TiB
14.60%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
73176
35.31%
0.00%
f03325538
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
491.91 TiB
9.10%
0.00%
Yes(110 claims)
116927
86.53%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
679.19 TiB
679.19 TiB
12.57%
2
126.44 TiB
252.88 TiB
4.68%
3
170.19 TiB
510.56 TiB
9.44%
4
71.34 TiB
285.38 TiB
5.28%
5
87.69 TiB
438.44 TiB
8.11%
6
122.63 TiB
735.75 TiB
13.61%
7
14.97 TiB
104.78 TiB
1.93%
8
17.47 TiB
139.75 TiB
2.58%
9
5.75 TiB
51.75 TiB
0.95%
10
8.81 TiB
88.13 TiB
1.63%
11
26.72 TiB
293.91 TiB
5.43%
12
40.56 TiB
486.75 TiB
9%
13
25.69 TiB
333.94 TiB
6.18%
14
63.91 TiB
894.69 TiB
16.55%
15
7.13 TiB
106.91 TiB
1.97%
1.43 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.