f0109903
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
19.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
6439
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.27 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
19.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
6439
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
148 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
27472
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
255.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131375
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
149.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83121
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
26.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.96%
Deal Percentage
1.3% / 352 GiB
Duplication
27388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
120.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.98%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
66866
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
150.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.25%
Deal Percentage
0.91% / 1.38 TiB
Duplication
122404
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
97.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.29%
Deal Percentage
6.96% / 6.81 TiB
Duplication
15991
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Xining, Qinghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
264.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.7%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
65696
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
108.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132508
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 16.66 TiB | 83.31 TiB | 6.21% |
| 6 | 45.28 TiB | 272.34 TiB | 20.3% |
| 3 | 480 GiB | 1.44 TiB | 0.1% |
| 2 | 105.19 TiB | 210.38 TiB | 15.68% |
| 7 | 44.5 TiB | 312.44 TiB | 23.29% |
| 4 | 24.72 TiB | 99.03 TiB | 7.38% |
| 1 | 207.41 TiB | 207.44 TiB | 15.46% |
| 8 | 18.53 TiB | 155 TiB | 11.55% |
| 462.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||