DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 181266

Client ID: f03245316

Report Detail
Report 181266 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.08 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 13

f01084941

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

101.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.98%

Deal Percentage

1.51% / 1.53 TiB

Duplication

257231

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0114153

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

14.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.28%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

259986

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01660795

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

239.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

138.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83121

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02828242

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

547.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.72%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

97015

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

216.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.24%

Deal Percentage

0.36% / 800 GiB

Duplication

27388

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099981

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

355.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.96%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

193151

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100004

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

1012.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131520

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

50 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.98%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

151.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112248

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228358

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

373.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.3%

Deal Percentage

1.43% / 5.34 TiB

Duplication

119916

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233966

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

336.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.59%

Deal Percentage

0.49% / 1.66 TiB

Duplication

81201

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03241837

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

1.54 PiB

Total Deal Size

30.77%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

221695

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
3 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
443.28 TiB
886.56 TiB
17.34%
4
12.53 TiB
50.13 TiB
0.98%
5
18.63 TiB
93.13 TiB
1.82%
12
33.84 TiB
407.38 TiB
7.97%
7
26.22 TiB
184.06 TiB
3.6%
11
23.72 TiB
262.19 TiB
5.12%
9
15.41 TiB
138.84 TiB
2.71%
6
97.13 TiB
586.34 TiB
11.47%
3
193.78 TiB
581.34 TiB
11.37%
10
70.22 TiB
703.44 TiB
13.76%
1
585.69 TiB
585.69 TiB
11.45%
8
56.94 TiB
455.53 TiB
8.91%
13
13.47 TiB
176.28 TiB
3.44%
1.55 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.