DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 183388

Client ID: f03252076

Report Detail
Report 183388 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

6.06 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 8

f01082888

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

342.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.63%

Deal Percentage

6.1% / 20.88 TiB

Duplication

518136

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

336.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.34%

Deal Percentage

3.33% / 11.19 TiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084941

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

281.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.66%

Deal Percentage

1.27% / 3.56 TiB

Duplication

257231

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01996719

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

236.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.48%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

94523

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10453 ms

Time to First Byte

84.77 Mbps

Bandwidth

f02088691

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

54.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.64%

Deal Percentage

25.06% / 13.63 TiB

Duplication

6626

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081958

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

338 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.43%

Deal Percentage

3.52% / 11.91 TiB

Duplication

134916

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228820

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

359.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

17.47%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

79098

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03253401

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

109.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

10501

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
105.75 TiB
659.03 TiB
32.03%
4
50.63 TiB
205.78 TiB
10%
3
9.59 TiB
29 TiB
1.4%
5
162.78 TiB
833.25 TiB
40.5%
2
7.47 TiB
15.09 TiB
0.73%
1
301.22 TiB
314.84 TiB
15.3%
637.44 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03136439
96 GiB
1
f03533180
192 GiB
1
f03552345
9.19 TiB
250