DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 177010

Client ID: f03266237

Report Detail
Report 177010 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.58 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 17

f01313

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

266.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.52%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

132763

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01660795

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

287.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.87%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01730296

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

5.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.09%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

6077

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02851143

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

99.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28229

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099981

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

257.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.36%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

193151

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100004

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

254 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.3%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131520

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

159.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

371.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.29%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130167

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233333

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

393.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.66%

Deal Percentage

0.04% / 160 GiB

Duplication

129059

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03241837

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

564.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.55%

Deal Percentage

0.16% / 896 GiB

Duplication

221695

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03325538

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

380 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.43%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

117174

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03358608

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

644.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.91%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

221502

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03363420

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

112.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.91%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

84198

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03408862

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

959.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.24%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 128 GiB

Duplication

146326

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499693

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

451.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.65%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

104515

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499694

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

679.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.5%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 96 GiB

Duplication

104615

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03526300

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

20.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

15991

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
10
18.84 TiB
188.44 TiB
3.18%
3
81.94 TiB
245.81 TiB
4.16%
4
110.34 TiB
441.44 TiB
7.47%
2
28.34 TiB
56.75 TiB
0.96%
13
50.38 TiB
654.91 TiB
11.08%
7
19.13 TiB
133.88 TiB
2.26%
15
95.13 TiB
1.39 PiB
24.16%
1
289.09 TiB
289.13 TiB
4.89%
12
93.59 TiB
1.1 PiB
19.01%
8
71.69 TiB
573.53 TiB
9.7%
6
19.22 TiB
115.31 TiB
1.95%
11
15.41 TiB
169.47 TiB
2.86%
9
3.41 TiB
30.66 TiB
0.51%
14
10.44 TiB
146.16 TiB
2.47%
16
1.03 TiB
16.5 TiB
0.27%
5
59.09 TiB
295.5 TiB
5%
967.06 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.