f01082868
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
448 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
46648
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
13.10 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
448 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
46648
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
960.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
27.24%
Deal Percentage
19.32% / 185.59 TiB
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
498.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
145.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
50479
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
149.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
51203
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
255.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
108784
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
255.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109098
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
255.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86125
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
405.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84805
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.67%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
87778
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
399.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
43454
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 105.78 TiB | 423.13 TiB | 11.99% |
| 2 | 200.34 TiB | 400.69 TiB | 11.35% |
| 3 | 199.28 TiB | 597.84 TiB | 16.94% |
| 6 | 144.5 TiB | 867 TiB | 24.57% |
| 5 | 5.47 TiB | 27.34 TiB | 0.77% |
| 1 | 1 PiB | 1.18 PiB | 34.34% |
| 1.64 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.