Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

NanHu

Client ID: f03285082

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

2 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 6176 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 15
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f01313
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
159.53 TiB
4.61%
0.00%
Yes(176 claims)
94525
84.76%
0.00%
0.00%
f01431043
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
99.41 TiB
2.87%
0.00%
Yes(27 claims)
32502
76.16%
0.00%
0.00%
f01660795
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
68.78 TiB
1.99%
0.00%
Yes(87 claims)
144395
40.78%
0.00%
0.00%
f02828242
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
319.72 TiB
9.23%
0.00%
Not reporting
96331
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
37.34 TiB
1.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
311279
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
472.41 TiB
13.64%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
187399
11.23%
0.00%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
335.63 TiB
9.69%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
126762
42.58%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156722
Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK
199.81 TiB
5.77%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
111020
79.58%
0.00%
0.00%
f03241837
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
10 TiB
0.29%
0.00%
Yes(5 claims)
219928
3.09%
0.00%
0.00%
f03242023
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
12.38 TiB
0.36%
0.00%
Not reporting
31385
81.41%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251993
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
375.03 TiB
10.83%
0.00%
Not reporting
73176
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03300709
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
143.91 TiB
4.16%
0.00%
Yes(129 claims)
20402
70.96%
0.00%
0.00%
f03321072
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
247.25 TiB
7.14%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
37697
51.40%
0.00%
0.00%
f03325538
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
299.16 TiB
8.64%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
116927
80.92%
0.00%
0.00%
f03408862
Dādri, Uttar Pradesh, IN
682.09 TiB
19.70%
1.26%
Yes(110 claims)
117951
82.07%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
124.69 TiB
124.69 TiB
3.59%
2
175.13 TiB
350.28 TiB
10.11%
3
38.44 TiB
115.31 TiB
3.32%
4
2.72 TiB
11.06 TiB
0.31%
5
38.72 TiB
201.97 TiB
5.83%
6
39.25 TiB
235.5 TiB
6.79%
7
59.72 TiB
418.03 TiB
12.06%
8
18.91 TiB
151.25 TiB
4.36%
9
75.94 TiB
683.44 TiB
19.73%
10
17.13 TiB
171.25 TiB
4.94%
11
33.31 TiB
366.47 TiB
10.58%
12
52.88 TiB
634.5 TiB
18.31%
676.81 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.