Open
No
N/A
4.50 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
366.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.39%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 192 GiB
Duplication
31944
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10046 ms
Time to First Byte
507.61 Mbps
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
380.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.68%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 128 GiB
Duplication
31838
Total Claims
22%
RPA
22%
Consistent RPA
78%
Inconsistent RPA
10056 ms
Time to First Byte
443.7 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hải Dương, Hai Phong, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
389.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.87%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
31888
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
381.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.71%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
31814
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
799.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 32 GiB
Duplication
130755
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
608.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111458
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
558.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
70394
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
553.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
73930
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
557.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.27%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74352
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
117.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82555
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
118.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82364
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
118.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83486
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 337.16 TiB | 1.32 PiB | 27.25% |
| 1 | 192.16 TiB | 192.16 TiB | 3.88% |
| 2 | 632.56 TiB | 1.24 PiB | 25.56% |
| 3 | 714.44 TiB | 2.09 PiB | 43.3% |
| 1.83 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||