f01531188
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
262.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
232475
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.25 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
262.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
232475
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
311.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.35%
Deal Percentage
3.09% / 9.63 TiB
Duplication
31944
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10046 ms
Time to First Byte
507.61 Mbps
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
262.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.24%
Deal Percentage
2.81% / 7.38 TiB
Duplication
31838
Total Claims
28%
RPA
28%
Consistent RPA
72%
Inconsistent RPA
10061 ms
Time to First Byte
549.83 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
278.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.92%
Deal Percentage
3.3% / 9.19 TiB
Duplication
31888
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
253.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.87%
Deal Percentage
3.29% / 8.34 TiB
Duplication
31814
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
262.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
232611
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
261.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
232529
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
239.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
216052
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
203.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74764
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 71.19 TiB | 213.94 TiB | 9.16% |
| 1 | 203.34 TiB | 203.38 TiB | 8.7% |
| 4 | 447.28 TiB | 1.78 PiB | 77.89% |
| 2 | 47.38 TiB | 99 TiB | 4.23% |
| 769.19 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||